Cited by 22Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Clinical significance of the mixing test in laboratory diagnoses of lupus anticoagulant

Hong, Sung Kuk., Hwang, Sang Mee., Kim, Ji-Eun, Kim, Hyun Kyung·2012·Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis

Abstract

The mixing test is used to determine the presence of inhibitors in laboratory diagnoses of lupus anticoagulant. Updated international guidelines state that an integrated lupus anticoagulant test system does not require the mixing test; an appraisal of the mixing tests in integrated lupus anticoagulant test systems is, therefore, required. We investigated the clinical relevance of mixing tests by using the best cutoff value of the mixing test through thrombotic risk analysis. A retrospective analysis was performed on 525 specimens with positive screening tests by using two integrated lupus anticoagulant tests: diluted Russell's Viper venom (dRVVT) and silica clotting time. The diagnostic performance of two interpretation formulas (percentage correction, Rosner index) was assessed, and the thrombotic risk of a subgroup based on the mixing results was investigated. Finally, the thrombotic risk of lupus anticoagulant positivity based on the integrated lupus anticoagulant test system procedures was assessed for the appraisal of mixing test exclusion in integrated lupus anticoagulant test systems. The best cutoff values of mixing test interpretation methods based on dRVVT were as follows: 60.1% for percentage correction and 15.7 for Rosner index. There was no substantial difference in the thrombotic risk between percentage correction and the Rosner index. The mixing-positive group showed a higher lupus anticoagulant titer and higher thrombotic risk than the mixing-negative group. H…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mbc.0b013e328358e899

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hong, S. K., Hwang, S. M., Kim, J.-E., & Kim, H. K.
Affiliations
Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Kim, Ji-Eun
  • Kim, Hyun Kyung
Venue
Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis
Published
2012-12
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
739-744
ISSN
0957-5235 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2331915197
Cited by
22
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
lupus anticoagulant, mixing test, thrombosis risk, diagnostic thresholds
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Partial Thromboplastin Time, Predictive Value of Tests, Prothrombin Time, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Thrombosis, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review