Cited by 15Adrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisRenal cell carcinoma treatment

Radiofrequency thermal ablation of hepatic metastases of adrenocortical cancer–a case report and review of the literature

Bauditz, J., Quinkler, M., Wermke, W.·2008·Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes

Abstract

AIM: Radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) has shown promise as a technique for treating solid tumors. This method has been suggested as an alternative to surgery in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the literature, and report the case of a patient with stage 4 ACC who received intraoperative and percutaneous RFA of two liver metastasis according to a standard ablation protocol. RESULTS: Post-interventional imaging in our patient demonstrated that after both interventions, a stellar-like structure of vital tumor tissue had remained within the coagulation necrosis. This was the starting point of a fast and progressive tumor recurrence. We suspect heat-sink effects of blood vessels in the highly vascularized metastasis to cause the tumor recurrence. In literature, there are only a few reports of RFA in ACC patients. In addition, there is no large randomized trial investigating the efficacy of RFA against surgery in those patients. CONCLUSIONS: Presently, RFA in ACC should be restricted to patients in whom surgery is contraindicated. It is necessary that strongly vascularized ACC metastases deserve a modified ablation protocol due to perfusion related cooling effects and to increase the efficacy of RFA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0028-1087178

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • General limitations for RFA include highly vascularized metastasis or proximity to large vessels, because both function as a heat sink preventing the full destructive effect of RFA.

    “There are general limitations for RFA, such as in cases of highly vascularized metastasis or proximity to large vessels, because both function as a heat sink preventing the full destructive effect of RFA (353).”

    From Adrenocortical carcinoma (2014) · cites this paper as [353]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bauditz, J., Quinkler, M., & Wermke, W.
Affiliations
Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Venue
Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes
Published
2008-12-03
Volume
117
Issue
07
Pages
316-319
ISSN
  • 0947-7349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-3646
OpenAlex
W1964953687
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Keywords
radiofrequency ablation, adrenocortical carcinoma, liver metastasis, intraoperative ablation, percutaneous ablation, tumor recurrence, heat sink effect, coagulative necrosis, alternative to surgery
MeSH terms
Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms, Adult, Carcinoma, Female, Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Ultrasonography, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review