The DOI matches its Crossref record.
European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition – Colonoscopic surveillance following adenoma removal
Open accessAbstract
Multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis have been developed by experts in a project coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The full guideline document covers the entire process of population-based screening. It consists of 10 chapters and over 250 recommendations, graded according to the strength of the recommendation and the supporting evidence. The 450-page guidelines and the extensive evidence base have been published by the European Commission. The chapter on colonoscopic surveillance following adenoma removal includes 24 graded recommendations. The content of the chapter is presented here to promote international discussion and collaboration by making the principles and standards recommended in the new EU Guidelines known to a wider professional and scientific community. Following these recommendations has the potential to enhance the control of colorectal cancer through improvement in the quality and effectiveness of surveillance and other elements in the screening process, including multi-disciplinary diagnosis and management of the disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Localised colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Argilés, G., Tabernero, J., Labianca, R., Hochhauser, D., Salazar, R., Iveson, T., Laurent-Puig, P., Quirke, P., Yoshino, T., Taieb, J., et al. (2020) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.022 · Cited by 1,375
Hassan, C., Quintero, E., Dumonceau, J.-M., Regula, J., Brandão, C., Chaussade, S., Dekker, E., Dinis-Ribeiro, M., Ferlitsch, M., Gimeno-García, A., et al. (2013) · Endoscopy · doi:10.1055/s-0033-1344548 · Cited by 554
Self-citationKaminski, M. F., Thomas‐Gibson, S., Bugajski, M., Bretthauer, M., Rees, C. J., Dekker, E., Hoff, G., Jover, R., Suchanek, S., Ferlitsch, M., et al. (2017) · United European Gastroenterology Journal · doi:10.1177/2050640617700014 · Cited by 346
Self-citationHassan, C., Spadaccini, M., Mori, Y., Foroutan, F., Facciorusso, A., Gkolfakis, P., Tziatzios, G., Triantafyllou, K., Antonelli, G., Khalaf, K., et al. (2023) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m22-3678 · Cited by 216
Metadata
- Authors
- Atkin, W., Valori, R., Kuipers, E., Hoff, G., Senore, C., Segnan, N., Jover, R., Schmiegel, W., Lambert, R., & Pox, C.
- Venue
- Endoscopy
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2012-09-25
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- S 03
- Pages
- SE151-SE163
- ISSN
- 0013-726X (ISSN-L)
- 1438-8812
- OpenAlex
- W2137529750
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition – Colonoscopic surveillance following adenoma removal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-0032-1309821
- The paper
- Atkin, W., Valori, R., Kuipers, E., Hoff, G., Senore, C., Segnan, N., Jover, R., Schmiegel, W., Lambert, R., & Pox, C. (2012). European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition – Colonoscopic surveillance following adenoma removal. Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1309821
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
