Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 554

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

Open access
Hassan, Cesare, Quintero, Enrique, Dumonceau, Jean-Marc, Regula, Jaroslaw, Brandão, Catarina, Chaussade, Stanislas, Dekker, Evelien, Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario, Ferlitsch, Monika, Gimeno-García, Antonio, Hazewinkel, Yark, Jover, Rodrigo, Kalager, Mette, Loberg, Magnus, Pox, Christian, Rembacken, Bjorn, Lieberman, David·2013·Endoscopy
DOI 10.1055/s-0033-1344548
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS: The following recommendations for post-polypectomy endoscopic surveillance should be applied only after a high quality baseline colonoscopy with complete removal of all detected neoplastic lesions.1 In the low risk group (patients with 1 - 2 tubular adenomas < 10 mm with low grade dysplasia), the ESGE recommends participation in existing national screening programmes 10 years after the index colonoscopy. If no screening programme is available, repetition of colonoscopy 10 years after the index colonoscopy is recommended (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). 2 In the high risk group (patients with adenomas with villous histology or high grade dysplasia or ≥10 mm in size, or ≥ 3 adenomas), the ESGE recommends surveillance colonoscopy 3 years after the index colonoscopy (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). Patients with 10 or more adenomas should be referred for genetic counselling (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). 3 In the high risk group, if no high risk adenomas are detected at the first surveillance examination, the ESGE suggests a 5-year interval before a second surveillance colonoscopy (weak recommendation, low quality evidence). If high risk adenomas are detected at first or subsequent surveillance examinations, a 3-year repetition of surveillance colonoscopy is recommended (strong recommendation, low quality evidence).4 The ESGE recommends that patients with serrated polyps < 10 mm in size with no dysplasia should be classified as low risk (weak recommendation, low quality evidence). The ESGE suggests that patients with large serrated polyps (≥ 10 mm) or those with dysplasia should be classified as high risk (weak recommendation, low quality evidence).5 The ESGE recommends that the endoscopist is responsible for providing a written recommendation for the post-polypectomy surveillance schedule (strong recommendation, low quality evidence).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0033-1344548

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 108 references

Cited by

See all 554

Metadata

Authors
Hassan, C., Quintero, E., Dumonceau, J.-M., Regula, J., Brandão, C., Chaussade, S., Dekker, E., Dinis-Ribeiro, M., Ferlitsch, M., Gimeno-García, A., Hazewinkel, Y., Jover, R., Kalager, M., Loberg, M., Pox, C., Rembacken, B., & Lieberman, D.
Venue
Endoscopy
Publisher
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Published
2013-09-12
Volume
45
Issue
10
Pages
842-864
ISSN
  • 0013-726X (ISSN-L)
  • 1438-8812
DOI
10.1055/s-0033-1344548
OpenAlex
W2114316928
Cited by
554
References
108
FWCI
19.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-0033-1344548
The paper
Hassan, C., Quintero, E., Dumonceau, J.-M., Regula, J., Brandão, C., Chaussade, S., Dekker, E., Dinis-Ribeiro, M., Ferlitsch, M., Gimeno-García, A., Hazewinkel, Y., Jover, R., Kalager, M., Loberg, M., Pox, C., Rembacken, B., & Lieberman, D. (2013). Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1344548

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.