The DOI matches its Crossref record; 140 of the 140 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative
Open accessAbstract
The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and United European Gastroenterology present a short list of key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. We recommend that endoscopy services across Europe adopt the following seven key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy for measurement and evaluation in daily practice at a center and endoscopist level: 1 rate of adequate bowel preparation (minimum standard 90%); 2 cecal intubation rate (minimum standard 90%); 3 adenoma detection rate (minimum standard 25%); 4 appropriate polypectomy technique (minimum standard 80%); 5 complication rate (minimum standard not set); 6 patient experience (minimum standard not set); 7 appropriate post‐polypectomy surveillance recommendations (minimum standard not set). Other identified performance measures have been listed as less relevant based on an assessment of their importance, scientific acceptability, feasibility, usability, and comparison to competing measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305
Lundell, L. R., Dent, J., Bennett, J. R., Blum, A. L., Armstrong, D., Galmiche, J. P., Johnson, F., Hongo, M., Richter, J. E., Spechler, S. J., et al. (1999) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.45.2.172 · Cited by 2,305
de Franchis, R. (2010) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2010.06.004 · Cited by 2,281
Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death
Corley, D. A., Jensen, C. D., Marks, A. R., Zhao, W. K., Lee, J. K., Doubeni, C. A., Zauber, A. G., de Boer, J., Fireman, B. H., Schottinger, J. E., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1309086 · Cited by 2,270
Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy and the Risk of Interval Cancer
Kaminski, M. F., Regula, J., Kraszewska, E., Polkowski, M., Wojciechowska, U., Didkowska, J., Zwierko, M., Rupinski, M., Nowacki, M. P., & Butruk, E. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0907667 · Cited by 2,010
Self-citationQuality indicators for colonoscopy
Rex, D. K., Schoenfeld, P. S., Cohen, J., Pike, I. M., Adler, D. G., Fennerty, M. B., Lieb, J. G., Park, W. G., Rizk, M. K., Sawhney, M. S., et al. (2015) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.058 · Cited by 1,764
Syngal, S., Brand, R. E., Church, J. M., Giardiello, F. M., Hampel, H. L., & Burt, R. W. (2015) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2014.435 · Cited by 1,662
Fitzgerald, R. C., di Pietro, M., Ragunath, K., Ang, Y., Kang, J.-Y., Watson, P., Trudgill, N., Patel, P., Kaye, P. V., Sanders, S., et al. (2014) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305372 · Cited by 1,346
Polyp Miss Rate Determined by Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review
van Rijn, J. C., Reitsma, J. B., Stoker, J., Bossuyt, P. M., van Deventer, S. J., & Dekker, E. (2006) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00390.x · Cited by 1,344
Self-citationColonoscopic Withdrawal Times and Adenoma Detection during Screening Colonoscopy
Barclay, R. L., Vicari, J. J., Doughty, A. S., Johanson, J. F., & Greenlaw, R. L. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa055498 · Cited by 1,313
Cited by
Rutter, M. D., Beintaris, I., Valori, R., Chiu, H. M., Corley, D. A., Cuatrecasas, M., Dekker, E., Forsberg, A., Gore-Booth, J., Haug, U., et al. (2018) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.038 · Cited by 361
Self-citationHassan, C., Wallace, M. B., Sharma, P., Maselli, R., Craviotto, V., Spadaccini, M., & Repici, A. (2020) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319914 · Cited by 189
Self-citationOptimizing the quality of colorectal cancer screening worldwide
Kaminski, M. F., Robertson, D. J., Senore, C., & Rex, D. K. (2020) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.11.026 · Cited by 171
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaminski, M. F., Thomas‐Gibson, S., Bugajski, M., Bretthauer, M., Rees, C. J., Dekker, E., Hoff, G., Jover, R., Suchanek, S., Ferlitsch, M., Anderson, J., Roesch, T., Hultcranz, R., Racz, I., Kuipers, E. J., Garborg, K., East, J. E., Rupinski, M., Seip, B., Bennett, C., Senore, C., Minozzi, S., Bisschops, R., Domagk, D., Valori, R., Spada, C., Hassan, C., Dinis‐Ribeiro, M., & Rutter, M. D.
- Venue
- United European Gastroenterology Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 309-334
- ISSN
- 2050-6406 (ISSN-L)
- 2050-6414
- OpenAlex
- W3025041373
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 140
- FWCI
- 14.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/2050640617700014
- The paper
- Kaminski, M. F., Thomas‐Gibson, S., Bugajski, M., Bretthauer, M., Rees, C. J., Dekker, E., Hoff, G., Jover, R., Suchanek, S., Ferlitsch, M., Anderson, J., Roesch, T., Hultcranz, R., Racz, I., Kuipers, E. J., Garborg, K., East, J. E., Rupinski, M., Seip, B., . . . Rutter, M. D. (2017). Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative. United European Gastroenterology Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640617700014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
