Cited by 115Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

iPractice: Piloting the Effectiveness of a Tablet-Based Home Practice Program in Aphasia Treatment

Open access
Wilkins, Abigail, Stokes, Polly, Kurland, Jacquie·2014·Seminars in Speech and Language

Abstract

The current study investigated the effectiveness of a home practice program based on the iPad (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA), implemented after 2 weeks of intensive language therapy, for maintaining and augmenting treatment gains in people with chronic poststroke aphasia. Five of eight original participants completed the 6-month home practice program in which they autonomously practiced retrieving words for objects and actions. Half of these words had been trained and half were untrained during therapy. Practice included tasks such as naming to confrontation, repeating from a video model, and picture/word matching presented on an iPad. All participants maintained advances made on words trained during the intensive treatment and additionally were able to learn new words by practicing daily over a 6-month period. The iPad and other tablet devices have great potential for personalized home practice to maintain and augment traditional aphasia rehabilitation. It appears that motivation to use the technology and adequate training are more important factors than age, aphasia type or severity, or prior experience with computers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0033-1362991

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [8]Palmer R Enderby P Cooper CC Latimer N Julious S Paterson G Computer therapy compared with usual care for people with long-standing aphasia poststroke: A pilot randomized controlled trial Stroke 2012 43 1904 1911 22733794

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilkins, A., Stokes, P., & Kurland, J.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Corresponding author
Kurland, Jacquie
Venue
Seminars in Speech and Language
Published
2014-01-21
Volume
35
Issue
01
Pages
051-064
ISSN
  • 0734-0478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-9056
OpenAlex
W2330107473
Cited by
115
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Seminars in Speech and Language (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC011526)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
aphasia, post-stroke aphasia, home practice, tablet-based intervention, iPad, maintenance of treatment gains, word retrieval, video modeling, picture-word matching, technology acceptance, motivation, personalized rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aphasia, Female, Humans, Language Therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Stroke, Computers, Handheld, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review