Local foreign-body reaction to commercial biodegradable implants: an in vivo animal study
Open accessAbstract
Biodegradable plates have been used extensively in fracture fixation since the 1960s. They rarely cause stress-protection atrophy or problems requiring secondary plate removal, common complications seen with metallic plates. However, aseptic foreign-body reactions have been reported, sometimes years after the original implantation. Both inadequate polymer degradation and debris accumulation have been implicated as causes. The current generation of commercial biodegradable plates is formulated to minimize this complication by altering the ratio of polylactic and polyglycolic acids. This in vivo study compares the degree of local foreign-body reaction of two commercially available resorbable plates in rabbits. Two types of biodegradable plates were examined: poly(D/L)lactide acid (PDLLA) and polylactide-co-glycolide acid (PLGA). Each plate was placed into a periosteal pericalvarial pocket created beneath the anterior or posterior scalp of a rabbit. Humane killing occurred at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Foreign-body reaction was evaluated histologically. The PDLLA plates demonstrated marked local foreign-body reactions within the implant capsule as early as 3 months after implantation, with presence of inflammatory cells and granulomatous giant cells in close association with the implant material. All local foreign-body reactions were subclinical with no corresponding tissue swelling requiring drainage. PLGA plates did not demonstrate any signs of inflammatory reactions. In addition, the PLGA plates did not appear to resorb or integrate at 12 months. Neither PDLLA nor PLGA plates demonstrated inflammation of the soft tissue or adjacent bone outside the implant capsule. In our study, the PDLLA plates demonstrated histological evidence of foreign-body reaction that is confined within the implant capsule, which was not seen with the PLGA plates. This finding may be attributable to the lack of significant resorption seen in the PLGA plates. Both PDLLA and PLGA plates were biocompatible with the rabbit tissue environment and should be considered for continued use in craniofacial, maxillofacial, and orthopedic reconstruction.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some studies still reported moderate degrees of FBR at implantation sites of biodegradable bioelectronics.
“However, some studies still reported moderate degrees of FBR at the implantation sites of biodegradable bioelectronics (Xue et al., 2014).”
From Foreign Body Reaction to Implanted Biomaterials and Its Impact in Nerve Neuroprosthetics (2021) · cites this paper as Xue et al., 2014
The paper reports local foreign-body reactions to biodegradable PDLLA fixation plates implanted in rabbits, with reactions confined to the implant capsule (Keywords; Discussion). It does not study biodegradable bioelectronics, and it describes the PDLLA reactions as marked rather than moderate; the PLGA plates showed no inflammatory reaction. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Late degradation tissue response to poly(?-lactide) bone plates and screws
Bergsma, J. (1995) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/0142-9612(95)91092-d · Cited by 799 · see citing works
Foreign-body reactions to fracture fixation implants of biodegradable synthetic polymers
Böstman, O. M., Hirvensalo, E., Mäkinen, J. E., & Rokkanen, P. (1990) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.72b4.2199452 · Cited by 524 · see citing works
Rubin, P. J., & Yaremchuk, M. J. (1997) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-199710000-00043 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Eppley, B. L., Morales, L., Wood, R. J., Pensler, J. M., Goldstein, J., Havlik, R. J., Habal, M. B., D, A. L. M., Williams, J. K., Burstein, F. D., et al. (2004) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000132856.69391.43 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
The Use of Biodegradable Plates and Screws to Stabilize Facial Fractures
Bell, R. B., & Kindsfater, C. S. (2005) · Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.joms.2005.09.010 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Observations on the Use of Rigid Fixation for Craniofacial Deformities in Infants and Young Children
Fearon, J. A., Munro, I. R., & Bruce, D. A. (1995) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-199504000-00002 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
van der Elst, M., Klein, C. P. A. T., Hogervorst, J. M. A., Patka, P., & Haarman, H. J. T. M. (1999) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(98)00117-3 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Tissue response to partially in vitro predegraded poly-L-lactide implants
de Jong, W. H., Bergsma, J. E., Robinson, J. E., & Bos, R. R. M. (2004) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.026 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Reasons for Removal of Rigid Internal Fixation Devices in Craniofacial Surgery
Orringer, J. S., Barcelona, V., & Buchman, S. R. (1998) · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery · doi:10.1097/00001665-199801000-00009 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Landes, C. A., Ballon, A., & Roth, C. (2006) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000218787.49887.73 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Speltz, M. L., Morton, K., Goodell, E. W., & Clarren, S. K. (1993) · The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal · doi:10.1597/1545-1569(1993)030 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
van der Elst, M., Dijkema, A. R., Klein, C. P. A. T., et al. (1995) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/0142-9612(95)98270-o · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Nkenke, E., Vairaktaris, E., Knipfer, C., et al. (2011) · Neurocirugía · doi:10.1016/s1130-1473(11)70105-1 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10 Eppley BL, Platis JM, Sadove AM. Experimental effects of bone plating in infancy on craniomaxillofacial skeletal growth. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1993;30(2):164 -169
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Foreign Body Reaction to Implanted Biomaterials and Its Impact in Nerve Neuroprosthetics
Carnicer-Lombarte, A., Chen, S.-T., Malliaras, G. G., & Barone, D. G. (2021) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.622524 · Cited by 454 · see citing works
“However, some studies still reported moderate degrees of FBR at the implantation sites of biodegradable bioelectronics (Xue et al., 2014).”
- Authors
- Xue, A. S., Koshy, J. C., Weathers, W. M., Wolfswinkel, E. M., Kaufman, Y., Sharabi, S. E., Brown, R. H., Hicks, M. J., & Hollier, L. H.
- Affiliations
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine
- Corresponding author
- Hollier, Larry H.
- Venue
- Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-33
- ISSN
- 1943-3875 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-3883
- PMC
- PMC3931768
- OpenAlex
- W2071084445
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Bone fractures and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
- Keywords
- foreign body reaction, biodegradable implants, resorbable plates, poly(D,L-lactide), polylactide-co-glycolide, fracture fixation, biocompatibility, implant resorption, granulomatous inflammation, rabbit model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review