Cited by 129Liver physiology and pathologyLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentLiver Diseases and Immunity

Resolution of Liver Fibrosis: Basic Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance

Ramachandran, Prakash, Iredale, John, Fallowfield, Jonathan·2015·Seminars in Liver Disease

Abstract

With evidence from a large number of animal models and clinical trials, it is now beyond debate that liver fibrosis and even cirrhosis are potentially reversible if the underlying cause can be successfully eliminated. However, in a significant proportion of patients cure of the underlying disease may not result in fibrosis regression or a significant reduction of the risk for hepatocellular carcinoma development. Understanding of the mechanistic pathways and regulatory factors that characterize matrix remodeling and architectural repair during fibrosis regression may provide therapeutic approaches to induce or accelerate regression as well as novel diagnostic tools. Recent seminal observations have determined that in resolving liver fibrosis a significant proportion of hepatic stellate cell-myofibroblasts (HSC-MFs) can revert to a near quiescent phenotype. Hepatic macrophages derived from inflammatory monocytes may contribute to fibrosis resolution through an in situ phenotypic switch mediated by phagocytosis. Emerging therapeutic approaches include deletion or inactivation of HSC-MFs, modulation of macrophage activity and autologous cell infusion therapies. Novel noninvasive diagnostic tests such as serum and imaging markers responsive to extracellular matrix degradation are being developed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of antifibrotic interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0035-1550057

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An earlier study implicated Ly6Clo macrophages in CCl4-treated mice as a potential source of proteolytic enzymes, but the human equivalent and specific proteases they secrete have not been established.

    “An earlier study implicated a specific subset of macrophages in mice treated with CCl4 that are low-Ly6C-expressing or “Ly6Clo” as a potential source of proteolytic enzymes (276, 277), but neither the human equivalent of these cells nor the specific proteases they secrete have been established.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramachandran, P., Iredale, J., & Fallowfield, J.
Affiliations
Centre for Inflammation Research (GB)
Corresponding author
Fallowfield, Jonathan
Venue
Seminars in Liver Disease
Published
2015-05-14
Volume
35
Issue
02
Pages
119-131
ISSN
  • 0272-8087 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-8971
OpenAlex
W1772733387
Cited by
129
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 3
FWCI
7.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Seminars in Liver Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS-CSF3-Fallowfield)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/J010766/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
Keywords
hepatic stellate cells, myofibroblasts, hepatic macrophages, inflammatory monocytes, phagocytosis, extracellular matrix remodeling, liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, antifibrotic therapy, non-invasive fibrosis markers, liver regeneration
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Signal Transduction, Recovery of Function, Hepatic Stellate Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review