Resolution of Liver Fibrosis: Basic Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance
Abstract
With evidence from a large number of animal models and clinical trials, it is now beyond debate that liver fibrosis and even cirrhosis are potentially reversible if the underlying cause can be successfully eliminated. However, in a significant proportion of patients cure of the underlying disease may not result in fibrosis regression or a significant reduction of the risk for hepatocellular carcinoma development. Understanding of the mechanistic pathways and regulatory factors that characterize matrix remodeling and architectural repair during fibrosis regression may provide therapeutic approaches to induce or accelerate regression as well as novel diagnostic tools. Recent seminal observations have determined that in resolving liver fibrosis a significant proportion of hepatic stellate cell-myofibroblasts (HSC-MFs) can revert to a near quiescent phenotype. Hepatic macrophages derived from inflammatory monocytes may contribute to fibrosis resolution through an in situ phenotypic switch mediated by phagocytosis. Emerging therapeutic approaches include deletion or inactivation of HSC-MFs, modulation of macrophage activity and autologous cell infusion therapies. Novel noninvasive diagnostic tests such as serum and imaging markers responsive to extracellular matrix degradation are being developed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of antifibrotic interventions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An earlier study implicated Ly6Clo macrophages in CCl4-treated mice as a potential source of proteolytic enzymes, but the human equivalent and specific proteases they secrete have not been established.
“An earlier study implicated a specific subset of macrophages in mice treated with CCl4 that are low-Ly6C-expressing or “Ly6Clo” as a potential source of proteolytic enzymes (276, 277), but neither the human equivalent of these cells nor the specific proteases they secrete have been established.”
From Found in translation—Fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis (MASH) (2023) · cites this paper as [276]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Macrophages in Tissue Repair, Regeneration, and Fibrosis
Wynn, T. A., & Vannella, K. M. (2016) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.015 · Cited by 4,481 · see citing works
Mechanisms of Organ Injury and Repair by Macrophages
Vannella, K. M., & Wynn, T. A. (2017) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-022516-034356 · Cited by 656 · see citing works
Targeting fibrosis: mechanisms and clinical trials
Zhao, M., Wang, L., Wang, M., Zhou, S., Lu, Y., Cui, H., Racanelli, A. C., Zhang, L., Ye, T., Ding, B., et al. (2022) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-022-01070-3 · Cited by 547 · see citing works
Found in translation—Fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis (MASH)
Wang, S., & Friedman, S. L. (2023) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.adi0759 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Angiocrine signaling in the hepatic sinusoids in health and disease
Kostallari, E., & Shah, V. H. (2016) · American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00118.2016 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Fibrosis resolution in the mouse liver: Role of Mmp12 and potential role of calpain 1/2
Sato, T., Head, K. Z., Li, J., Dolin, C. E., Wilkey, D., Skirtich, N., Smith, K., McCreary, D. D., Liu, S., Beier, J. I., et al. (2023) · Matrix Biology Plus · doi:10.1016/j.mbplus.2022.100127 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ramachandran, P., Iredale, J., & Fallowfield, J.
- Affiliations
- Centre for Inflammation Research (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fallowfield, Jonathan
- Venue
- Seminars in Liver Disease
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2015-05-14
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 119-131
- ISSN
- 0272-8087 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-8971
- OpenAlex
- W1772733387
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 7.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Seminars in Liver Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS-CSF3-Fallowfield)
- Medical Research Council (MR/J010766/1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
- Keywords
- hepatic stellate cells, myofibroblasts, hepatic macrophages, inflammatory monocytes, phagocytosis, extracellular matrix remodeling, liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, antifibrotic therapy, non-invasive fibrosis markers, liver regeneration
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Signal Transduction, Recovery of Function, Hepatic Stellate Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review