Cited by 88Colorectal Cancer Surgical TreatmentsPelvic floor disorders treatmentsColorectal and Anal Carcinomas

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Current Management and Future Directions

Open access
Berger, Nicholas, Ludwig, Kirk, Ridolfi, Timothy·2016·Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery

Abstract

Outcomes for rectal cancer surgery have improved significantly over the past 20 years with increasing rates of survival and recurrence, specifically local recurrence. These gains have been realized during a period of time in which there has been an increasing emphasis on sphincter preservation. As we have become increasingly aggressive in avoiding resection of the anus, we have begun accepting bowel dysfunction as a normal outcome. Low anterior resection syndrome, defined as a constellation of symptoms including incontinence, frequency, urgency, or feelings of incomplete emptying, has a significant impact on quality of life and results in many patients opting for a permanent colostomy to avoid these symptoms. In this article, we will highlight the most recent clinical and basic science research on this topic and discuss areas of future investigation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0036-1584500

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Heppell J, Kelly KA, Phillips SF, Beart RW Jr, Telander RL, Perrault J. Physiologic aspects of continence after colectomy, mucosal proc- tectomy, and endorectal ileo-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1982; 195(4):435-443

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berger, N., Ludwig, K., & Ridolfi, T.
Affiliations
Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Corresponding author
Ridolfi, Timothy
Venue
Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery
Published
2016-08-19
Volume
29
Issue
03
Pages
239-245
ISSN
  • 1521-5741 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-0043
  • 1530-9681
OpenAlex
W2512979748
Cited by
88
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
Keywords
low anterior resection syndrome, rectal cancer surgery, sphincter preservation, fecal incontinence, bowel dysfunction, quality of life, permanent colostomy, local recurrence, anorectal function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review