The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting Adverse Outcome in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Risk Score
Abstract
Summary: Reliable prediction of adverse outcomes in acute pulmonary embolism may help choose between in-hospital and ambulatory treatment. We aimed to identify predictors of adverse events in patients with pulmonary embolism and to generate a simple risk score for use in clinical settings. We prospectively followed 296 consecutive patients with pulmonary embolism admitted through the emergency ward. Logistic regression was used to predict death, recurrent thromboembolic event, or major bleeding at 3 months. Thirty patients (10.1%) had one or more adverse events during the 3-month follow-up period: 25 patients (8.4%) died, thromboembolic events recurred in 10 patients (3.4%), and major bleeding occurred in 5 patients (1.7%). Factors associated with an adverse outcome in multivariate analysis were cancer, heart failure, previous deep vein thrombosis, systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg, arterial PaO2 <8 kPa, and presence of deep vein thrombosis on ultrasound. A risk score was calculated by adding 2 points for cancer and hypotension, and 1 point each for the other predictors. A score of 2 best identified patients at risk of an adverse outcome in a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Of 180 low-risk patients (67.2%) (score ≤2), only 4 experienced an adverse outcome (2.2%), compared to 23 (26.1%) of 88 high-risk patients (score ≥3). A simple risk score based on easily available variables can accurately identify patients with pulmonary embolism at low risk of an adverse outcome. Such a score may be useful for selecting patients with pulmonary embolism eligible for outpatient care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical data analysis in the computer age
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.253.5018.390 · Cited by 1,192
Cited by
Kearon (2012) · doi:10.1378/chest.11-2301 · Cited by 6,119
Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease
Kearon, C., Akl, E. A., Ornelas, J., Blaivas, A., Jimenez, D., Bounameaux, H., Huisman, M., King, C. S., Morris, T. A., Sood, N., et al. (2016) · Chest · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2015.11.026 · Cited by 4,830
Self-citation2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism
Authors/Task Force Members, Konstantinides, S. V., Torbicki, A., Agnelli, G., Danchin, N., Fitzmaurice, D., Galiè, N., Gibbs, J. S. R., Huisman, M. V., Humbert, M., et al. (2014) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu283 · Cited by 3,128
Self-citationJiménez, D. (2010) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.199 · Cited by 1,354
Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for pulmonary embolism
Aujesky, D., Obrosky, D. S., Stone, R. A., Auble, T. E., Perrier, A., Cornuz, J., Roy, P.-M., & Fine, M. J. (2005) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200506-862oc · Cited by 1,303
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wicki, J., Perneger, T., Bounameaux, H., Junod, A., & Perrier, A.
- Venue
- Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 548-552
- ISSN
- 0340-6245 (ISSN-L)
- 2567-689X
- OpenAlex
- W1851369583
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting Adverse Outcome in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Risk Score. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-0037-1614065
- The paper
- Wicki, J., Perneger, T., Bounameaux, H., Junod, A., & Perrier, A. (2000). Predicting Adverse Outcome in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Risk Score. Thrombosis and Haemostasis. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1614065
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.