Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 885

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative

Open access
Kaminski, Michal, Thomas-Gibson, Siwan, Bugajski, Marek, Bretthauer, Michael, Rees, Colin, Dekker, Evelien, Hoff, Geir, Jover, Rodrigo, Suchanek, Stepan, Ferlitsch, Monika, Anderson, John, Roesch, Thomas, Hultcranz, Rolf, Racz, Istvan, Kuipers, Ernst, Garborg, Kjetil, East, James, Rupinski, Maciej, Seip, Birgitte, Bennett, Cathy, Senore, Carlo, Minozzi, Silvia, Bisschops, Raf, Domagk, Dirk, Valori, Roland, Spada, Cristiano, Hassan, Cesare, Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario, Rutter, Matthew·2017·Endoscopy

Abstract

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and United European Gastroenterology present a short list of key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. We recommend that endoscopy services across Europe adopt the following seven key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy for measurement and evaluation in daily practice at a center and endoscopist level: 1 Rate of adequate bowel preparation (minimum standard 90 %); 2 Cecal intubation rate (minimum standard 90 %); 3 Adenoma detection rate (minimum standard 25 %); 4 Appropriate polypectomy technique (minimum standard 80 %); 5 Complication rate (minimum standard not set); 6 Patient experience (minimum standard not set); 7 Appropriate post-polypectomy surveillance recommendations (minimum standard not set). Other identified performance measures have been listed as less relevant based on an assessment of their importance, scientific acceptability, feasibility, usability, and comparison to competing measures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0043-103411

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 885

Metadata

Authors
Kaminski, M., Thomas-Gibson, S., Bugajski, M., Bretthauer, M., Rees, C., Dekker, E., Hoff, G., Jover, R., Suchanek, S., Ferlitsch, M., Anderson, J., Roesch, T., Hultcranz, R., Racz, I., Kuipers, E., Garborg, K., East, J., Rupinski, M., Seip, B., Bennett, C., Senore, C., Minozzi, S., Bisschops, R., Domagk, D., Valori, R., Spada, C., Hassan, C., Dinis-Ribeiro, M., & Rutter, M.
Venue
Endoscopy
Published
2017-03-07
Volume
49
Issue
04
Pages
378-397
ISSN
  • 0013-726X (ISSN-L)
  • 1438-8812
OpenAlex
W2510086083
Cited by
885
References
3
FWCI
31.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-0043-103411
The paper
Kaminski, M., Thomas-Gibson, S., Bugajski, M., Bretthauer, M., Rees, C., Dekker, E., Hoff, G., Jover, R., Suchanek, S., Ferlitsch, M., Anderson, J., Roesch, T., Hultcranz, R., Racz, I., Kuipers, E., Garborg, K., East, J., Rupinski, M., Seip, B., . . . Rutter, M. (2017). Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-103411

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.