Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 331

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 106 of the 106 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2022

Open access
Pennazio, Marco, Rondonotti, Emanuele, Despott, Edward J., Dray, Xavier, Keuchel, Martin, Moreels, Tom, Sanders, David S., Spada, Cristiano, Carretero, Cristina, Cortegoso Valdivia, Pablo, Elli, Luca, Fuccio, Lorenzo, Gonzalez Suarez, Begona, Koulaouzidis, Anastasios, Kunovsky, Lumir, McNamara, Deirdre, Neumann, Helmut, Perez-Cuadrado-Martinez, Enrique, Perez-Cuadrado-Robles, Enrique, Piccirelli, Stefania, Rosa, Bruno, Saurin, Jean-Christophe, Sidhu, Reena, Tacheci, Ilja, Vlachou, Erasmia, Triantafyllou, Konstantinos·2023·Endoscopy

Abstract

Main Recommendations: MR1 ESGE recommends small-bowel capsule endoscopy as the first-line examination, before consideration of other endoscopic and radiological diagnostic tests for suspected small-bowel bleeding, given the excellent safety profile of capsule endoscopy, its patient tolerability, and its potential to visualize the entire small-bowel mucosa.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR2 ESGE recommends small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with overt suspected small-bowel bleeding as soon as possible after the bleeding episode, ideally within 48 hours, to maximize the diagnostic and subsequent therapeutic yield.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR3 ESGE does not recommend routine second-look endoscopy prior to small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding or iron-deficiency anemia.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. MR4 ESGE recommends conservative management in those patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding and high quality negative small-bowel capsule endoscopy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR5 ESGE recommends device-assisted enteroscopy to confirm and possibly treat lesions identified by small-bowel capsule endoscopy.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR6 ESGE recommends the performance of small-bowel capsule endoscopy as a first-line examination in patients with iron-deficiency anemia when small bowel evaluation is indicated.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR7 ESGE recommends small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected Crohn’s disease and negative ileocolonoscopy findings as the initial diagnostic modality for investigating the small bowel, in the absence of obstructive symptoms or known bowel stenosis.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR8 ESGE recommends, in patients with unremarkable or nondiagnostic findings from dedicated small-bowel cross-sectional imaging, small-bowel capsule endoscopy as a subsequent investigation if deemed likely to influence patient management.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. MR9 ESGE recommends, in patients with established Crohn’s disease, the use of a patency capsule before small-bowel capsule endoscopy to decrease the capsule retention rate.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR10 ESGE recommends device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) as an alternative to surgery for foreign bodies retained in the small bowel requiring retrieval in patients without acute intestinal obstruction.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR11 ESGE recommends DAE-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (DAE-ERCP) as a first-line endoscopic approach to treat pancreaticobiliary diseases in patients with surgically altered anatomy (except for Billroth II patients).Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/a-1973-3796

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 106 references

Cited by

See all 331

Metadata

Authors
Pennazio, M., Rondonotti, E., Despott, E. J., Dray, X., Keuchel, M., Moreels, T., Sanders, D. S., Spada, C., Carretero, C., Cortegoso Valdivia, P., Elli, L., Fuccio, L., Gonzalez Suarez, B., Koulaouzidis, A., Kunovsky, L., McNamara, D., Neumann, H., Perez-Cuadrado-Martinez, E., Perez-Cuadrado-Robles, E., Piccirelli, S., Rosa, B., Saurin, J.-C., Sidhu, R., Tacheci, I., Vlachou, E., & Triantafyllou, K.
Venue
Endoscopy
Published
2022-11-24
Volume
55
Issue
01
Pages
58-95
ISSN
  • 0013-726X (ISSN-L)
  • 1438-8812
OpenAlex
W4309918438
Cited by
331
References
106
FWCI
49.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2022. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/a-1973-3796
The paper
Pennazio, M., Rondonotti, E., Despott, E. J., Dray, X., Keuchel, M., Moreels, T., Sanders, D. S., Spada, C., Carretero, C., Cortegoso Valdivia, P., Elli, L., Fuccio, L., Gonzalez Suarez, B., Koulaouzidis, A., Kunovsky, L., McNamara, D., Neumann, H., Perez-Cuadrado-Martinez, E., Perez-Cuadrado-Robles, E., . . . Triantafyllou, K. (2023). Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2022. Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1973-3796

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.