Electronic health record use and perceptions among urologic surgeons
Open accessAbstract
Objective Electronic health records (EHRs) have become widely adopted with increasing emphasis on improving care delivery. Improvements in surgery may be limited by specialty-specific issues that impact EHR usability and engagement. Accordingly, we examined EHR use and perceptions in urology, a diverse surgical specialty. Methods We conducted a national, sequential explanatory mixed methods study. Through the 2019 American Urological Association Census, we surveyed urologic surgeons on EHR use and perceptions and then identified associated characteristics through bivariable and multivariable analyses. Using purposeful sampling, we interviewed 25 urologists and applied coding-based thematic analysis, which was then integrated with survey findings. Results Among 2,159 practicing urologic surgeons, 2,081 (96.4%) reported using an EHR. In the weighted sample (n = 12,366), over 90% used the EHR for charting, viewing results, and order entry with most using information exchange functions (59.0–79.6%). In contrast, only 35.8% felt the EHR increases clinical efficiency, whereas 43.1% agreed it improves patient care, which related thematically to information management, administrative burden, patient safety, and patient–surgeon interaction. Quantitatively and qualitatively, use and perceptions differed by years in practice and practice type with more use and better perceptions among more recent entrants into the urologic workforce and those in academic/multispecialty practices, who may have earlier EHR exposure, better infrastructure, and more support. Conclusion Despite wide and substantive usage, EHRs engender mixed feelings, especially among longer-practicing surgeons and those in lower-resourced settings (e.g., smaller and private practices). Beyond reducing administrative burden and simplifying information management, efforts to improve care delivery through the EHR should focus on surgeon engagement, particularly in the community, to boost implementation and user experience.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732305276687 · Cited by 44,601 · see citing works
Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
Robinson, P. M. (2007) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00096.x · Cited by 23,297 · see citing works
Allocation of Physician Time in Ambulatory Practice: A Time and Motion Study in 4 Specialties
Sinsky, C., Colligan, L., Li, L., Prgomet, M., Reynolds, S., Goeders, L., Westbrook, J., Tutty, M., & Blike, G. (2016) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m16-0961 · Cited by 1,494 · see citing works
Shanafelt, T. D., Dyrbye, L. N., Sinsky, C., Hasan, O., Satele, D., Sloan, J., & West, C. P. (2016) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.05.007 · Cited by 1,086 · see citing works
with the HITEC Investigators, Ancker, J. S., Edwards, A., Nosal, S., Hauser, D., Mauer, E., & Kaushal, R. (2017) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0430-8 · Cited by 709 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and Surgical Decision-making.
Loftus, T. J., Tighe, P. J., Filiberto, A. C., Efron, P. A., Brakenridge, S. C., Mohr, A. M., Rashidi, P., Upchurch, G. R., & Bihorac, A. (2020) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4917 · Cited by 611 · see citing works
Alkureishi, M. A., Lee, W. W., Lyons, M., Press, V. G., Imam, S., Nkansah-Amankra, A., Werner, D. A., & Arora, V. M. (2016) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-015-3582-1 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Ren, Y., Loftus, T. J., Datta, S., Ruppert, M. M., Guan, Z., Miao, S., Shickel, B., Zheng, F., Giordano, C. R., Upchurch, G. R., et al. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.11973 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Patient Safety Issues From Information Overload in Electronic Medical Records
Nijor, S., Rallis, G., Lad, N., & Gokcen, E. (2022) · Journal of Patient Safety · doi:10.1097/pts.0000000000001002 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Understanding the Costs Associated With Surgical Care Delivery in the Medicare Population
Kaye, D. R., Luckenbaugh, A. N., Oerline, M. K., Hollenbeck, B. K., Herrel, L. A., Dimick, J. B., & Hollingsworth, J. M. (2019) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000003165 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Differences in total and after-hours electronic health record time across ambulatory specialties.
Rotenstein, L. S., Holmgren, A. J., Downing, N. L., & Bates, D. W. (2021) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.0256 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Mahoney, S. T., Strassle, P. D., Schroen, A. T., Agans, R., Turner, P. L., Meyer, A. A., Freischlag, J. A., & Brownstein, M. R. (2020) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.12.003 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Building the evidence-base to reduce electronic health record–related clinician burden
Dymek, C., Kim, B. I., Melton, G. B., Payne, T. H., Singh, H., & Hsiao, C. (2020) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa238 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Boothman, R. C., Imhoff, S. J., & Campbell, D. A. (2012) · Frontiers of Health Services Management · doi:10.1097/01974520-201201000-00003 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Use of electronic medical records differs by specialty and office settings
Kokkonen, E. W. J., Davis, S., Lin, H., Dabade, T. S., Feldman, S. R., & Fleischer, A. B. (2013) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001609 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Rapid growth in surgeons’ use of secure messaging in a patient portal
Shenson, J. A., Cronin, R. M., Davis, S. E., Chen, Q., & Jackson, G. P. (2015) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4347-y · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Kratzke, I. M., Rosenbaum, M., Cox, C., Ollila, D. W., & Kapadia, M. R. (2021) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0836 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Jamoom, E. W., & Heisey Grove, D. (2016) · Journal of Health & Medical Informatics · doi:10.4172/2157-7420.1000240 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Practice Characteristics and Job Satisfaction of Private Practice and Academic Surgeons
Mahoney, S. T., Irish, W. D., Strassle, P. D., Schroen, A. T., Freischlag, J. A., Tuttle-Newhall, J. E., & Brownstein, M. R. (2020) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5670 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Brown, C. S., Montgomery, J. R., Neiman, P. U., Wakam, G. K., Tsai, T. C., Dimick, J. B., & Scott, J. W. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5503 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Physician Specialty and Variations in Adoption of Electronic Health Records
Banerjee, S., Kaushal, R., Kern, L. M., & Grinspan, Z. M. (2013) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.4338/aci-2013-02-ra-0015 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Resident Physician Experience and Duration of Electronic Health Record Use
Holmgren, A. J., Lindeman, B. M., & Ford, E. W. (2021) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0041-1732403 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
McCormick, B. J., Deal, A. M., Borawski, K. M., Raynor, M., Viprakasit, D. P., Wallen, E., Woods, M. E., & Pruthi, R. S. (2018) · World Journal of Urology · doi:10.1007/s00345-018-2293-8 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationRotenstein, L. S., Apathy, N. C., Landon, B. E., & Bates, D. W. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8301 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Lammers, E. J., McLaughlin, C. G., & Barna, M. J. (2016) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12586 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Unplanned hospital visits after ambulatory surgical care
Bongiovanni, T., Parzynski, C. S., Ranasinghe, I., Steinman, M. A., & Ross, J. S. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0254039 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Quantified electronic health record (EHR) use by academic surgeons
Cox, M. L., Risoli, T., Peskoe, S. B., Turner, D. A., & Migaly, J. (2021) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2020.12.009 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Quantifying the Electronic Health Record Burden in Head and Neck Cancer Care
Ebbers, T., Kool, R. B., Smeele, L. E., Takes, R. P., van den Broek, G. B., & Dirven, R. J. (2022) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0042-1756422 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Trends and perceptions of electronic health record usage among plastic surgeons
Seu, M., Cho, B. H., Pigott, R., Sarmiento, S., Pedreira, R., Bhat, D., & Sacks, J. (2020) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000002709 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Shelton, J. B., Pichardo, D., Meeks, W. D., Suh, R. S., Wood, E. L., Smith, N., Nolin, M., Ross, K., Schlossberg, S. M., Wolf, S., et al. (2020) · Urology Practice · doi:10.1097/upj.0000000000000198 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationSurgeons' Perspective of a Newly Initiated Electronic Medical Record
Frazee, R. C., Harmon, L. A., & Papaconstantinou, H. T. (2016) · Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings · doi:10.1080/08998280.2016.11929344 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Association between Electronic Health Records and Health Care Utilization
Edwards, A. M., Kern, L. M., Kaushal, R., & with the HITEC Investigators (2015) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.4338/aci-2014-10-ra-0089 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 33 Alkureishi MA, LeeWW,LyonsM,etal.Impactofelectronicmedical record use on the patient-doctor relationship and communication: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2016;31(05):548 -560
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Electronic Health Record Usage Patterns Across Surgical Subspecialties
Tang, K., Labagnara, K., Babar, M., Loloi, J., Watts, K. L., Jariwala, S., & Abraham, N. (2024) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.1055/a-2194-1061 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Tan, H., Spratte, B. N., Deal, A. M., Heiling, H., Nazzal, E. M., Meeks, W., Fang, R., Teal, R., Vu, M. B., Bennett, A. V., et al. (2024) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2024.04.033 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationLane, G. I., Reines, K., Meeks, W. D., Mbassa, R., Ellimoottil, C. S., Faris, A. E. R., Reuland, D. S., Nielsen, M. E., Teal, R., Vu, M. B., et al. (2023) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2023.10.026 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationZubkov, M. R., Iguidbashian, J., Lun, Z., Bata, K. E., Gunn-Sandell, L. B., Crosby, D., Stoebner, K., Tharp, D., Staubli, L., Lin, C., et al. (2025) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116386 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Ha, D., Russell, N., Olson, K. E., Whitney, G., Kulungowski, A. M., McCourt, E. A., & Rove, K. O. (2025) · Journal of Pediatric Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162191 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Nguyen, O. T., Ahmad, A., Doering, M. M., & Abraham, J. (2026) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocag035 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Surgeon Decision-Making: A Contemporary, Qualitative Analysis of Urologists
Spratte, B. N., Poulos, K. E., Reines, K., Blalock, S. J., Bennett, A. V., Gessner, K. H., Nielsen, M. E., Reuland, D. S., Basch, E., & Tan, H.-J. (2025) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1097/xcs.0000000000001498 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationViitanen, J., Nisula, S., Tuovinen, T., & Lääveri, T. (2026) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2026.106355
- Authors
- Tan, H.-J., Chung, A. E., Gotz, D., Deal, A. M., Heiling, H. M., Teal, R., Vu, M. B., Meeks, W. D., Fang, R., Bennett, A. V., Nielsen, M. E., & Basch, E.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Duke University (US)
- American Urological Association (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Applied Clinical Informatics
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2023-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 279-289
- ISSN
- 1869-0327 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10097476
- OpenAlex
- W4365133658
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 1.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Applied Clinical Informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (P30CA016086)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
- Keywords
- electronic health records, EHR usability, surgeon perceptions, administrative burden, information management, patient safety, academic vs community practice, practice size, EHR implementation, clinical efficiency
- MeSH terms
- Delivery of Health Care, Patient Care, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Urologic Surgical Procedures, Electronic Health Records, Surgeons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
