The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of Three Mentha Species Essential Oils
Abstract
The present study describes the antimicrobial activity and free radical scavenging capacity (RSC) of essential oils from Mentha aquatica L., Mentha longifolia L., and Mentha piperita L. The chemical profile of each essential oil was determined by GC-MS and TLC. All essential oils exhibited very strong antibacterial activity, in particularly against Esherichia coli strains. The most powerful was M. piperita essential oil, especially towards multiresistant strain of Shigella sonei and Micrococcus flavus ATTC 10,240. All tested oils showed significant fungistatic and fungicidal activity [expressed as minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal fungicidal concentration (MFC) values, respectively], that were considerably higher than those of the commercial fungicide bifonazole. The essential oils of M. piperita and M. longifolia were found to be more active than the essential oil of M. aquatica. Especially low MIC (4 microL/mL) and MFC (4 microL/mL) were found with M. piperita oil against Trichophyton tonsurans and Candida albicans (both 8 microL/mL). The RSC was evaluated by measuring the scavenging activity of the essential oils on the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and OH radicals. All examined essential oils were able to reduce DPPH radicals into the neutral DPPH-H form, and this activity was dose-dependent. However, only the M. piperita oil reduced DPPH to 50 % (IC50 = 2.53 microg/mL). The M. piperita essential oil also exhibited the highest OH radical scavenging activity, reducing OH radical generation in the Fenton reaction by 24 % (pure oil). According to GC-MS and TLC (dot-blot techniques), the most powerful scavenging compounds were monoterpene ketones (menthone and isomenthone) in the essential oils of M. longifolia and M. piperita and 1,8-cineole in the oil of M. aquatica.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Masyita, A., Mustika Sari, R., Dwi Astuti, A., Yasir, B., Rahma Rumata, N., Emran, T. B., Nainu, F., & Simal-Gandara, J. (2022) · Food Chemistry: X · doi:10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100217 · Cited by 1,052
Essential Oils: Sources of Antimicrobials and Food Preservatives
Pandey, A. K., Kumar, P., Singh, P., Tripathi, N. N., & Bajpai, V. K. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.02161 · Cited by 508
Diniz do Nascimento, L., Moraes, A. A. B. D., Costa, K. S. D., Pereira Galúcio, J. M., Taube, P. S., Costa, C. M. L., Neves Cruz, J., de Aguiar Andrade, E. H., & Faria, L. J. G. D. (2020) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom10070988 · Cited by 470
Terpenoids as Plant Antioxidants
Graßmann, J. (2005) · Vitamins & Hormones · doi:10.1016/s0083-6729(05)72015-x · Cited by 465
Biochemical activities of Iranian Mentha piperita L. and Myrtus communis L. essential oils
Yadegarinia, D., Gachkar, L., Rezaei, M. B., Taghizadeh, M., Astaneh, S. A., & Rasooli, I. (2006) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.04.025 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Venue
- Planta Medica
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 413-419
- ISSN
- 0032-0943 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-0221
- OpenAlex
- W1712412702
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of Three Mentha Species Essential Oils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-2003-39704
- The paper
- Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of Three Mentha Species Essential Oils. (2003). Planta Medica. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-39704
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.