The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In Vitro Anticancer Activity of Fruit Extracts from Vaccinium Species
Abstract
Fruit extracts of four Vaccinium species (lowbush blueberry, bilberry, cranberry, and lingonberry) were screened for anticarcinogenic compounds by a combination of fractionation and in vitro testing of their ability to induce the Phase II xenobiotic detoxification enzyme quinone reductase (QR) and to inhibit the induction of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), the rate-limiting enzyme in polyamine synthesis, by the tumor promoter phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (TPA). The crude extracts, anthocyanin and proanthocyanidin fractions were not highly active in QR induction whereas the ethyl acetate extracts were active QR inducers. The concentrations required to double QR activity (designated CDqr) for the ethyl acetate extracts of lowbush blueberry, cranberry, lingonberry, and bilberry were 4.2, 3.7, 1.3, and 1.0 microgram tannic acid equivalents (TAE), respectively, Further fractionation of the bilberry ethyl acetate extract revealed that the majority of inducer potency was contained in a hexane/chloroform subfraction (CDqr = 0.07 microgram TAE). In contrast to their effects on QR, crude extracts of lowbush blueberry, cranberry, and lingonberry were active inhibitors of ODC activity. The concentrations of these crude extracts needed to inhibit ODC activity by 50% (designated IC50) were 8.0, 7.0, and 9.0 micrograms TAE, respectively. The greatest activity in these extracts appeared to be contained in the polymeric proanthocyanidin fractions of the lowbush blueberry, cranberry, and lingonberry fruits (IC50 = 3.0, 6.0, and 5.0 micrograms TAE, respectively). The anthocyanidin and ethyl acetate extracts of the four Vaccinium species were either inactive or relatively weak inhibitors of ODC activity. Thus, components of the hexane/chloroform fraction of bilberry and of the proanthocyanidin fraction of lowbush blueberry, cranberry, and lingonberry exhibit potential anticarcinogenic activity as evaluated by in vitro screening tests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dietary flavonoids: Effects on xenobiotic and carcinogen metabolism
Moon, Y. J., Wang, X., & Morris, M. E. (2006) · Toxicology in Vitro · doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2005.06.048 · Cited by 869
Häkkinen, S. H., & Törrönen, A. R. (2000) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/s0963-9969(00)00086-7 · Cited by 538
Ju, Z. Y., & Howard, L. R. (2003) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf0302106 · Cited by 388
Karlsen, A., Retterstøl, L., Laake, P., Paur, I., Kjølsrud-Bøhn, S., Sandvik, L., & Blomhoff, R. (2007) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/137.8.1951 · Cited by 384
Cyanidins: metabolism and biological properties
Galvano, F., La Fauci, L., Lazzarino, G., Fogliano, V., Ritieni, A., Ciappellano, S., Battistini, N. C., Tavazzi, B., & Galvano, G. (2004) · The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jnutbio.2003.07.004 · Cited by 356
Metadata
- Authors
- Bomser, J., Madhavi, D., Singletary, K., & Smith, M.
- Venue
- Planta Medica
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 212-216
- ISSN
- 0032-0943 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-0221
- OpenAlex
- W2006726144
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vitro Anticancer Activity of Fruit Extracts from Vaccinium Species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-2006-957862
- The paper
- Bomser, J., Madhavi, D., Singletary, K., & Smith, M. (1996). In Vitro Anticancer Activity of Fruit Extracts from Vaccinium Species. Planta Medica. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-957862
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.