Cited by 65Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsPreterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis

The Evidence for Abandoning the Amniotic Fluid Index in Favor of the Single Deepest Pocket

Magann, Everett, Chauhan, Suneet, Doherty, Dorota, Magann, Marcia, Morrison, John·2007·American Journal of Perinatology

Abstract

This study assessed whether the amniotic fluid index (AFI) or the single deepest pocket (SDP) is the best technique to estimate amniotic fluid volume. The AFI and SDP were compared to a dye-determined or directly measured amniotic fluid volume. A PUBMED search from 1990 to 2006 was conducted using the search terms "single deepest pocket" or "largest vertical pocket" or "maximum vertical pocket" or "2X1 pocket" AND "amniotic fluid index". One study compared the AFI and SDP to a dye-determined amniotic fluid volume. There were 1219 publications that used the search term SDP-LVP-MVP versus 4378 using AFI. Twenty publications contained both the AFI and SDP, but only six compared the AFI and SDP. Both the AFI and the SDP poorly identified abnormal amniotic fluid volumes, and neither technique was superior to the other. The AFI identifies a significantly greater number of women as having oligohydramnios versus the SDP but without any difference in perinatal outcomes. Compared with SDP, AFI excessively characterizes a greater number of pregnancies as having oligohydramnios leading to more interventions without improvement in perinatal outcome. The AFI should be abandoned and the SDP used to estimate amniotic fluid volume.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-2007-986689

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Magann, E., Chauhan, S., Doherty, D., Magann, M., & Morrison, J.
Affiliations
  • Naval Medical Center Portsmouth (US)
  • Aurora Health Care (US)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
Venue
American Journal of Perinatology
Published
2007-09
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
549-555
ISSN
  • 0735-1631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-8785
OpenAlex
W2072462568
Cited by
65
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Perinatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Keywords
amniotic fluid index, oligohydramnios, polyhydramnios, prenatal ultrasound, perinatal outcomes, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Amniotic Fluid, Female, Humans, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Oligohydramnios, Ultrasonography, Prenatal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review