Cited by 365Hemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluation of Right-Heart Catheterization in the Critically Ill Patient without Acute Myocardial Infarction

Connors, Alfred F., McCaffree, D. Robert, Gray, Barry A.·1983·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

FLOW-directed right-heart catheterization is used extensively to monitor the hemodynamic status of critically ill patients. After acute myocardial infarction, measurements of the cardiac index and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure are useful in several ways: they allow accurate assessment of short-term and long-term prognosis,1 help in directing immediate and subsequent therapy,2 3 4 and correlate well with the clinical assessment of the hemodynamic status.5 Although there is no evidence that right-heart catheterization reduces the mortality of patients with acute myocardial infarction,6 the information it yields is sufficiently useful in assessing prognosis and directing therapy that the risks associated with catheterization7 , 8 are thought to . . .

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198302033080508

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 10.1016/0002-9149(78)90156-X · DOI
  2. 10.1056/NEJM197107222850402 · DOI
  3. 10.1056/NEJM197312132892401 · DOI
  4. 10.1172/JCI106371 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0002-9149(77)80182-3 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0002-9149(80)90620-7 · DOI
  7. 10.1056/NEJM197404252901702 · DOI
  8. 10.1378/chest.76.6.647 · DOI
  9. 10.1056/NEJM197612092952406 · DOI
  10. Siegel S. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956:184–93.
  11. 10.7326/0003-4819-76-1-29 · DOI
  12. 10.1378/chest.67.1.8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 318

Metadata

Authors
Connors, A. F., McCaffree, D. R., & Gray, B. A.
Affiliations
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1983-02-03
Volume
308
Issue
5
Pages
263-267
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2033283702
Cited by
365
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
23.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
right heart catheterization, hemodynamic monitoring, critically ill patients, acute myocardial infarction, cardiac index, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, prognostic assessment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Blood Pressure, Critical Care, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Female, Cardiac Catheterization, Hemodynamics, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Organ Failure, Pulmonary Wedge Pressure, Technology Assessment, Biomedical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review