The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of Right-Heart Catheterization in the Critically Ill Patient without Acute Myocardial Infarction
Abstract
FLOW-directed right-heart catheterization is used extensively to monitor the hemodynamic status of critically ill patients. After acute myocardial infarction, measurements of the cardiac index and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure are useful in several ways: they allow accurate assessment of short-term and long-term prognosis,1 help in directing immediate and subsequent therapy,2 3 4 and correlate well with the clinical assessment of the hemodynamic status.5 Although there is no evidence that right-heart catheterization reduces the mortality of patients with acute myocardial infarction,6 the information it yields is sufficiently useful in assessing prognosis and directing therapy that the risks associated with catheterization7 , 8 are thought to . . .
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It is important to appreciate that estimations of cardiac function, cardiac output and tissue oxygenation, based on the interpretation of standard clinical parameters, such as the physical examination, and hemodynamic parameters such as the central venous pressure, heart rate and blood pressure are often discordant from measured values [7, 8].”
From Management of the Low Cardiac Output Syndrome Following Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease (2016) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- 10.1016/0002-9149(78)90156-X · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM197107222850402 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM197312132892401 · DOI
- 10.1172/JCI106371 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0002-9149(77)80182-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/0002-9149(80)90620-7 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM197404252901702 · DOI
- 10.1378/chest.76.6.647 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM197612092952406 · DOI
- Siegel S. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956:184–93.
- 10.7326/0003-4819-76-1-29 · DOI
- 10.1378/chest.67.1.8 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–318 of 318
L’échocardiographie transthoracique et transœsophagienne
Cholley, B., & Slama, M. (2007) · doi:10.1007/978-2-287-71154-1_7
Cardiac Monitoring in the Neurosciences Critical Care Unit
Arab, D., Kirmani, J., Xavier, A., Yahia, A. M., Suarez, J., & Qureshi, A. (2004) · Humana Press eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-59259-660-7_8
Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring
Huettemann, E., Sakka, S., & Reinhart, K. (2002) · doi:10.1007/0-306-47664-9_16
How to Interpret Cardiac Output and Haemodynamic Indexes
Vincent, J., & Yalavatti, G. (2001) · doi:10.1007/978-88-470-2955-2_2
Evaluation of Hemodynamics and Oxygen Delivery
Kaufman, D. (2001) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-6645-5_7
Pulmonalarterienkatheter (PAK): Evaluierung der Methode
Putterman, C., & Sprung, C. (1999) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-58629-3_1
Der Pulmonalarterienkatheter: Druckmonitoring
Leatherman, J., & Marini, J. (1999) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-58629-3_6
Indikationen für die Pulmonalarterienkatheterisierung
Phelan, J. M., Parrillo, J. E., Putterman, C., & Sprung, C. (1999) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-58629-3_2
Stratégie d'exploration de la performance cardique au lit du malade
Dhainaut, J., & Cariou, A. (1992) · doi:10.1016/s1164-6756(05)80195-1
Noe, C. E., & Haynsworth, R. F. (1991) · doi:10.1080/08998280.1991.11929744
Introduction — Hemodynamic Monitoring: A Cost/Benefit Analysis
Dhainaut, J., & Payen, D. (1991) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-84167-5_1
Pulmonary Artery Catheterization and Its Problems
Chitkara, R., & Serio, G. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4534-6_25
London, M. J., & Mangano, D. (1988) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-1771-5_7
Monitoring beim kardialen Risikopatienten
Reinhart, K. (1985) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-70798-8_3
Metadata
- Authors
- Connors, A. F., McCaffree, D. R., & Gray, B. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
- ORCID
- Connors, Alfred F.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1983-02-03
- Volume
- 308
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 263-267
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2033283702
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 23.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- right heart catheterization, hemodynamic monitoring, critically ill patients, acute myocardial infarction, cardiac index, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, prognostic assessment
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Blood Pressure, Critical Care, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Female, Cardiac Catheterization, Hemodynamics, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Organ Failure, Pulmonary Wedge Pressure, Technology Assessment, Biomedical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
