Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 304

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In Vivo Activated T Lymphocytes in the Peripheral Blood and Cerebrospinal Fluid of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Hafler, David A., Fox, David A., Manning, Mary Elizabeth, Schlossman, Stuart F., Reinherz, Ellis L., Weiner, Howard L.·1985·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

We found an increase in peripheral-blood lymphocytes bearing the T-cell-specific activation antigen Ta1 in 20 of 35 patients with progressive multiple sclerosis, 4 of 18 patients with stable or improving multiple sclerosis, 1 of 17 patients with other neurologic diseases, and 1 of 14 normal controls (P less than 0.0002, Fisher's exact test). No increases in two other markers of T-cell activation, T113 and the interleukin-2 receptor, were found. In the cerebrospinal fluid, patients with progressive multiple sclerosis (pleocytosis, 3.9 +/- 1.6 cells per cubic millimeter) had 42 +/- 3.0 per cent Ta1+ cells. In contrast, patients with other inflammatory central nervous system diseases (36 +/- 13 cells per cubic millimeter) had 9.6 +/- 1.8 per cent Ta1+ cells (P less than 0.01). In patients with other neurologic diseases without inflammation (0.7 +/- 0.16 cells per cubic millimeter), the percentage of Ta1+ cells was equivalent to that in patients with multiple sclerosis (39 +/- 5.4 per cent), although the absolute number was lower. There was a positive correlation between the presence of Ta1+ cells in the spinal fluid and blood of patients with other neurologic diseases, but not patients with multiple sclerosis. Less than 1 per cent of lymphocytes from the spinal fluid of patients with multiple sclerosis expressed interleukin-2 receptors, as compared with 9.8 per cent of cells from subjects with other inflammatory neurologic diseases (P less than 0.01). These results suggest that the T cells in the spinal fluid of patients with multiple sclerosis may be activated by a different mechanism or in a different temporal sequence from that in patients with other nervous system diseases. Furthermore, the increase in Ta1+ cells in the peripheral blood of patients with multiple sclerosis demonstrates systemic immune activation in the disease; monitoring such cells may provide an objective measure of abnormal immunologic activity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198505303122201

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 304

Metadata

Authors
Hafler, D. A., Fox, D. A., Manning, M. E., Schlossman, S. F., Reinherz, E. L., & Weiner, H. L.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1985-05-30
Volume
312
Issue
22
Pages
1405-1411
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2319014405
Cited by
304
References
34
FWCI
27.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vivo Activated T Lymphocytes in the Peripheral Blood and Cerebrospinal Fluid of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198505303122201
The paper
Hafler, D. A., Fox, D. A., Manning, M. E., Schlossman, S. F., Reinherz, E. L., & Weiner, H. L. (1985). In Vivo Activated T Lymphocytes in the Peripheral Blood and Cerebrospinal Fluid of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198505303122201

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.