The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relation of Glucose Tolerance to Complications of Pregnancy in Nondiabetic Women
Abstract
An increase in fetal and maternal complications has been documented in cases of gestational diabetes, but the glucose levels that predict an increased risk have not been clearly defined. We evaluated the frequency of several neonatal complications (macrosomia, congenital anomalies, perinatal mortality, and prematurity) and maternal complications (toxemia, cesarean section, or both) in relation to glucose tolerance in 249 women in the third trimester of pregnancy. None of the women had previous evidence of diabetes, and all had normal results on an oral glucose-tolerance test, according to accepted criteria. On the basis of their two-hour plasma glucose levels, women were divided into three groups: A (glucose less than 100 mg per deciliter), B (glucose 100 to 119 mg per deciliter), and C (glucose 120 to 164 mg per deciliter). The higher two-hour plasma glucose levels were associated with a significant increase in the incidence of macrosomia (9.9, 15.5, and 27.5 percent in Groups A, B, and C, respectively), congenital abnormalities (0.7, 3.5, and 5.0 percent), and toxemia, cesarean section, or both (19.9, 25.9, and 40.0 percent). A significant correlation between the infant's weight and the mother's two-hour plasma glucose level was also observed. These data indicate that even limited degrees of maternal hyperglycemia, which are currently considered to be within the normal range, may affect the outcome of pregnancy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Screening criteria for high-risk gestational diabetic patients
O'Sullivan, J. B., Mahan, C. M., Charles, D., & Dandrow, R. V. (1973) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(16)33833-9 · Cited by 478
Cited by
Practice Bulletin No. 183: postpartum hemorrhage
(2017) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002351 · Cited by 1,406
Hattersley, A. T., & Tooke, J. E. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)07546-1 · Cited by 914
Gestational diabetes: The consequences of not treating
Langer, O., Yogev, Y., Most, O., & Xenakis, E. M. J. (2005) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.039 · Cited by 677
Increased fetal adiposity: a very sensitive marker of abnormal in utero development
Catalano, P. M., Thomas, A., Huston-Presley, L., & Amini, S. B. (2003) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(03)00828-7 · Cited by 519
Hughes, R. C. E., Moore, M. P., Gullam, J. E., Mohamed, K., & Rowan, J. (2014) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc14-1312 · Cited by 238
Metadata
- Authors
- Tallarigo, L., Giampietro, O., Penno, G., Miccoli, R., Gregori, G., & Navalesi, R.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1986-10-16
- Volume
- 315
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 989-992
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2092771184
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relation of Glucose Tolerance to Complications of Pregnancy in Nondiabetic Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198610163151603
- The paper
- Tallarigo, L., Giampietro, O., Penno, G., Miccoli, R., Gregori, G., & Navalesi, R. (1986). Relation of Glucose Tolerance to Complications of Pregnancy in Nondiabetic Women. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198610163151603
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.