Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 222

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chloramphenicol-Resistant Salmonella newport Traced through Hamburger to Dairy Farms

Spika, John S., Waterman, Stephen H., Hoo, Guy W. Soo, St. Louis, Michael E., Pacer, Richard E., James, Susan M., Bissett, Marjorie L., Mayer, Leonard W., Chiu, Joseph Y., Hall, Betty, Greene, Katherine, Potter, Morris E., Cohen, Mitchell L., Blake, Paul A.·1987·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Animal-to-human transmission of drug-resistant salmonella and the role of antimicrobial use in food animals in the emergence of these bacteria are controversial subjects. Investigation of a 4.9-fold increase in Salmonella newport isolations from Californians in 1985 showed that 87 percent of the isolates had an unusual antimicrobial-resistance pattern (including chloramphenicol resistance) and a single, identical plasmid. Interviews of 45 patients and 89 matched controls in Los Angeles County showed that illness was associated with penicillin or tetracycline use during the month before onset (P less than 0.001) and with eating ground beef during the week before onset (P = 0.052). The epidemic strain was isolated from hamburger products eaten by cases, abattoirs where the animals from which the meat came were slaughtered, dairies that sent cows for slaughter on days when culture-positive products were processed, and ill dairy cows. Isolation of salmonella from beef carcasses in abattoirs correlated with the proportion of dead or moribund animals received for slaughter (r = 0.60, P less than 0.05). Isolation of chloramphenicol-resistant salmonella from dairy farms was associated with the use of chloramphenicol at those dairies. We conclude that food animals are a major source of antimicrobial-resistant salmonella infections in humans and that these infections are associated with antimicrobial use on farms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198703053161001

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 222

Metadata

Authors
Spika, J. S., Waterman, S. H., Hoo, G. W. S., St. Louis, M. E., Pacer, R. E., James, S. M., Bissett, M. L., Mayer, L. W., Chiu, J. Y., Hall, B., Greene, K., Potter, M. E., Cohen, M. L., & Blake, P. A.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1987-03-05
Volume
316
Issue
10
Pages
565-570
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2318876458
Cited by
222
References
2
FWCI
29.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chloramphenicol-Resistant Salmonella newport Traced through Hamburger to Dairy Farms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198703053161001
The paper
Spika, J. S., Waterman, S. H., Hoo, G. W. S., St. Louis, M. E., Pacer, R. E., James, S. M., Bissett, M. L., Mayer, L. W., Chiu, J. Y., Hall, B., Greene, K., Potter, M. E., Cohen, M. L., & Blake, P. A. (1987). Chloramphenicol-Resistant Salmonella newport Traced through Hamburger to Dairy Farms. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198703053161001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.