Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence of an Association Between Use of Anti‐microbial Agents in Food Animals and Anti‐microbial Resistance Among Bacteria Isolated from Humans and the Human Health Consequences of Such Resistance

Angulo, F. J., Nargund, V. N., Chiller, T. C.·2004·Journal of Veterinary Medicine, Series B

Abstract

Summary: Several lines of evidence indicate that the use of anti‐microbial agents in food animals is associated with anti‐microbial resistance among bacteria isolated from humans. The use of anti‐microbial agents in food animals is most clearly associated with anti‐microbial resistance among Salmonella and Campylobacter isolated from humans, but also appears likely among enterococci, Escherichia coli and other bacteria. Evidence is also accumulating that the anti‐microbial resistance among bacteria isolated from humans could be the result of using anti‐microbial agents in food animals and is leading to human health consequences. These human health consequences include: (i) infections that would not have otherwise occurred and (ii) increased frequency of treatment failures and increased severity of infection. Increased severity of infection includes longer duration of illness, increased frequency of bloodstream infections, increased hospitalization and increased mortality. Continued work and research efforts will provide more evidence to explain the connection between the use of anti‐microbial agents in food animals and anti‐microbial‐resistant infections in humans. One particular focus, which would solidify this connection, is to understand the factors that dictate spread of resistance determinants, especially resistant genes. With continued efforts on the part of the medical, veterinary and public health community, such research may contribute to more precise guidelines on the use of anti‐microbials in food animals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2004.00789.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 355

Metadata

Authors
Angulo, F. J., Nargund, V. N., & Chiller, T. C.
Venue
Journal of Veterinary Medicine, Series B
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-10
Volume
51
Issue
8-9
Pages
374-379
ISSN
0931-1793 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100534595
Cited by
355
References
27
FWCI
13.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence of an Association Between Use of Anti‐microbial Agents in Food Animals and Anti‐microbial Resistance Among Bacteria Isolated from Humans and the Human Health Consequences of Such Resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1439-0450.2004.00789.x
The paper
Angulo, F. J., Nargund, V. N., & Chiller, T. C. (2004). Evidence of an Association Between Use of Anti‐microbial Agents in Food Animals and Anti‐microbial Resistance Among Bacteria Isolated from Humans and the Human Health Consequences of Such Resistance. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, Series B. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0450.2004.00789.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.