The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Risk of Breast Cancer after Estrogen and Estrogen–Progestin Replacement
Abstract
To examine the risk of breast cancer after noncontraceptive treatment with estrogen, we conducted a prospective study of 23,244 women 35 years of age or older who had had estrogen prescriptions filled in the Uppsala region of Sweden. During the follow-up period (mean, 5.7 years) breast cancer developed in 253 women. Compared with other women in the same region, the women in the estrogen cohort had an overall relative risk of breast cancer of 1.1 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.0 to 1.3). The relative risk increased with the duration of estrogen treatment (P = 0.002), reaching 1.7 after nine years (95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.7). Estradiol (used in 56 percent of the treatment periods in the cohort) was associated with a 1.8-fold increase in risk after more than six years of treatment (95 percent confidence interval, 0.7 to 4.6). No increase in risk was found after the use of conjugated estrogens (used in 22 percent of the treatment periods) or other types, mainly estriols (used in 22 percent of the treatment periods). Although the numbers of women were smaller, the risk of breast cancer was highest among the women who took estrogen and progestin in combination for extended periods. The relative risk was 4.4 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.9 to 22.4) in women who used only this combination for more than six years. Among women who had previously used estrogens alone, the relative risk after three years or more of use of the combination regimen was 2.3 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.7 to 7.8). We conclude that in this cohort, long-term perimenopausal treatment with estrogens (or at least estradiol compounds) seems to be associated with a slightly increased risk of breast cancer, which is not prevented and may even be increased by the addition of progestins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The use of estrogens and progestins and the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.
Colditz, G. A., Hankinson, S. E., Hunter, D. J., Willett, W. C., Manson, J. E., Stampfer, M. J., Hennekens, C., Rosner, B., & Speizer, F. E. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199506153322401 · Cited by 1,487
Wood, D., De Backer, G., Faergeman, O., Graham, I., Mancia, G., & Pyörälä, K. (1998) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/s0021-9150(98)90209-x · Cited by 1,255
Selection of Controls in Case-Control Studies
Wacholder, S., McLaughlin, J. K., Silverman, D. T., & Mandel, J. S. (1992) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116396 · Cited by 998
Decreased Mortality in Users of Estrogen Replacement Therapy
Henderson, B. E. (1991) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1991.00400010095012 · Cited by 632
Is dehydroepiandrosterone a hormone?
Labrie, F., Luu-The, V, Bélanger, A., Lin, S.-X., Simard, J., Pelletier, G., & Labrie, C. (2005) · Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1677/joe.1.06264 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Bergkvist, L., Adami, H.-O., Persson, I., Hoover, R., & Schairer, C.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1989-08-03
- Volume
- 321
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 293-297
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2336953700
- Cited by
- 613
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 47.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Risk of Breast Cancer after Estrogen and Estrogen–Progestin Replacement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198908033210505
- The paper
- Bergkvist, L., Adami, H.-O., Persson, I., Hoover, R., & Schairer, C. (1989). The Risk of Breast Cancer after Estrogen and Estrogen–Progestin Replacement. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198908033210505
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.