Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 349

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preliminary Report of the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Study

Open access
Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Study Group Investigators·1990·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation, even in the absence of rheumatic valvular disease, predisposes patients to embolic complications, but the role of antithrombotic therapy in the prevention of such complications has not been fully clarified. We therefore performed a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate warfarin and aspirin individually as prophylaxis against ischemic stroke and systemic embolism (the primary events) in such patients. Patients eligible to receive warfarin (group 1) were assigned to warfarin (open label), aspirin (325 mg per day), or placebo (aspirin and placebo were given in a doubleblind fashion). Those who were not eligible for warfarin (group 2) received either aspirin or placebo in a double-blind fashion. The placebo arm of group 1 was recently terminated, when evidence emerged that each active agent was superior to placebo. In this paper we report preliminary data on active therapy (with either warfarin or aspirin) as compared with placebo in group 1, and on aspirin as compared with placebo in groups 1 and 2 combined. By November 1989, 1244 patients had been followed for a mean of 1.13 years. The event rates were 1.6 percent per year in the 393 patients who made up the two active treatment arms (warfarin and aspirin) of group 1, and 8.3 percent per year in the 195 patients who made up the placebo arm (P less than 0.00005) (risk reduction, 81 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 56 to 91). In all 517 patients given aspirin, the rate of primary events (3.2 percent per year) was lower than that in the 528 patients given placebo (6.3 percent per year; P = 0.014) (risk reduction, 49 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 15 to 69). However, we were unable to show a benefit of aspirin in patients over 75 years of age. These preliminary data indicate that antithrombotic therapy with warfarin or aspirin is effective in the short term in reducing the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation due to causes other than rheumatic valvular disease. The relative benefits of aspirin and warfarin remain unclear, and the trial is continuing in order to address this issue.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199003223221232

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 349

Metadata

Authors
Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Study Group Investigators
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1990-03-22
Volume
322
Issue
12
Pages
863-868
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2587299378
Cited by
349
References
1
FWCI
50.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.