Cited by 135Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Risk of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial flutter

Seidl, Karlheinz, Hauer, Bernd, Schwick, Nicola G, Zellner, Dietmar, Zahn, Ralf, Senges, Jochen·1998·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Based on multiple studies, clear, guided anticoagulation therapy is recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation. The value of anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial flutter, however, is less well established. Little is known about the incidence of thromboembolism in patients with atrial flutter. We evaluated the risk of thromboembolism in 191 consecutive unselected patients referred for treatment of atrial flutter. A history of embolic events was noted in 11 patients. Acute embolism (<48 hours) occurred in 4 patients (3 after direct current cardioversion, 1 after catheter ablation). During follow-up of 26+/-18 months, 9 patients experienced thromboembolic events. During the follow-up, the overall embolic event rate (including acute embolism and thromboembolic events during follow-up) was 7 % in this patient population. Risk indicators for an embolic event in an univariate analysis were organic heart disease (p = 0.037), depressed left ventricular function (p = 0.02), history of systemic hypertension (p = 0.004), and diabetes mellitus (p = 0.0038). Using multivariate analysis, a history of hypertension was the only independent predictor for elevated embolic risk in this patient population (odds ratio = 6.5; 95% confidence intervals 1.5 to 45). Thus, the thromboembolic risk is higher than previously recognized for patients with atrial flutter. Anticoagulation therapy may decrease this risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00419-6

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seidl, K., Hauer, B., Schwick, N. G., Zellner, D., Zahn, R., & Senges, J.
Affiliations
Klinikum Ludwigshafen (DE)
Corresponding author
Seidl, Karlheinz
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-09
Volume
82
Issue
5
Pages
580-583
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023282715
Cited by
135
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
atrial flutter, thromboembolism, anticoagulation, hypertension, left ventricular function, organic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, cardioversion, catheter ablation, atrial fibrillation
MeSH terms
Aged, Anticoagulants, Atrial Flutter, Intracranial Embolism and Thrombosis, Electric Countershock, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Risk, Thromboembolism, Odds Ratio, Catheter Ablation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review