The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genital Tumors among Men with Psoriasis Exposed to Psoralens and Ultraviolet A Radiation (PUVA) and Ultraviolet B Radiation
Open accessAbstract
Squamous-cell cancer occurs only rarely on the male genitalia. In a 12.3-year prospective study of 892 men in a cohort of patients with psoriasis who had been treated with oral methoxsalen (8-methoxypsoralen) and ultraviolet A photochemotherapy (PUVA), we identified 14 patients (1.6 percent) with 30 genital neoplasms. The standard morbidity ratio (which was used as a measure of the risk of a genital neoplasm) comparing morbidity among patients treated with PUVA with that expected on the basis of population incidence data was 95.7 (95 percent confidence interval, 43.8 to 181.8) for invasive squamous-cell carcinoma of the penis and scrotum, and 58.8 (26.9 to 111.7) for invasive and in situ penile tumors. In patients exposed to high levels of PUVA, the incidence of invasive squamous-cell carcinoma was 286 times that in the general population and 16.3 times that in patients exposed to low levels (P less than 0.001 for both comparisons). After controlling for the level of exposure to PUVA, we found that patients exposed to high levels of ultraviolet B radiation had a risk of genital tumors 4.6 times higher than that in other patients (95 percent confidence interval, 1.4 to 15.1). The strongly dose-dependent increase in the risk of genital tumors associated with exposure to PUVA and ultraviolet B radiation that we observed makes it prudent for men to use genital protection whenever they are exposed to PUVA or other forms of ultraviolet radiation for therapeutic, recreational, or cosmetic reasons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The carcinogenic risks of modern tanning equipment: Is UV-A safer than UV-B?
van Weelden, H., de Gruijl, F. R., van der Putte, S. C. J., Toonstra, J., & van der Leun, J. C. (1988) · Archives of Dermatological Research · doi:10.1007/bf00440604 · Cited by 74
Cited by
Toxic effects of ultraviolet radiation on the skin
Matsumura, Y., & Ananthaswamy, H. N. (2004) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2003.08.019 · Cited by 1,270
Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis
Gottlieb, A., Korman, N. J., Gordon, K. B., Feldman, S. R., Lebwohl, M., Koo, J. Y. M., Van Voorhees, A. S., Elmets, C. A., Leonardi, C. L., Beutner, K. R., et al. (2008) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2008.02.040 · Cited by 769
Stern, R. S., Nichols, K. T., & Väkevä, L. H. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199704103361501 · Cited by 656
Self-citationGreaves, M. W., & Weinstein, G. D. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199503023320907 · Cited by 512
Ibbotson, S. H., Bilsland, D., Cox, N. H., Dawe, R. S., Diffey, B., Edwards, C., Farr, P. M., Ferguson, J., Hart, G., Hawk, J., et al. (2004) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06128.x · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Stern, R. S., & Study*, M. O. T. P. F.-U.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1990-04-19
- Volume
- 322
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1093-1097
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2325436451
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genital Tumors among Men with Psoriasis Exposed to Psoralens and Ultraviolet A Radiation (PUVA) and Ultraviolet B Radiation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199004193221601
- The paper
- Stern, R. S., & Study*, M. O. T. P. F.-U. (1990). Genital Tumors among Men with Psoriasis Exposed to Psoralens and Ultraviolet A Radiation (PUVA) and Ultraviolet B Radiation. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199004193221601
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.