Cited by 243Healthcare cost, quality, practicesHealthcare Policy and ManagementClinical practice guidelines implementation

What Physicians Know

Tanenbaum, Sandra J.·1993·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

It has become a truism that not only does the United States spend more money on health care than do other industrialized nations, but also a substantial portion of this sum is wasted on unproved or ineffective diagnosis and therapy. Not surprisingly, then, outcomes research -- that is, the rigorous determination of what works in medical care and what does not -- figures prominently in proposals for health care reform. Outcomes research, by informing the content of policy positions, payment rules, and practice guidelines, presumably both solves the problems of quality and cost that beset the health care system and . . .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199310213291713

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tanenbaum, S. J.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Tanenbaum, Sandra J.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1993-10-21
Volume
329
Issue
17
Pages
1268-1271
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2000597191
Cited by
243
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 11
FWCI
54.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
outcomes research, evidence-based medicine, physician knowledge, health care costs, ineffective treatments, health care reform, quality of care, clinical guidelines, payment rules
MeSH terms
Humans, Philosophy, Medical, Public Policy, United States, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review