Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 599

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular Diagnosis of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

Open access
Powell, Steven M., Petersen, Gloria M., Krush, Anne J., Booker, Susan, Jen, Jin, Giardiello, Francis M., Hamilton, Stanley R., Vogelstein, Bert, Kinzler, Kenneth W.·1993·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Familial adenomatous polyposis is an inherited disease characterized by multiple colorectal tumors. The diagnosis has classically been based on the detection of multiple colorectal adenomas. The recent identification of germline mutations of the APC gene in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis makes presymptomatic molecular diagnosis possible, but the widespread distribution of the many mutations within this very large gene have heretofore made the search for such mutations impractical. We describe a novel approach that allows molecular genetic diagnosis in the majority of patients with the disease. METHODS: We screened 62 unrelated patients from the Johns Hopkins Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Registry for germline APC mutations. Primary screening was accomplished by analysis of protein synthesized in vitro from surrogate APC genes. In addition, the relative amount of transcript from each APC allele was determined with an allele-specific--expression assay. RESULTS: The protein assay revealed truncated protein in 51 of the 62 patients (82 percent). In 3 of the 11 remaining patients, the allele-specific--expression assay revealed significantly reduced expression of one allele of the APC gene. The use of these two assays in combination successfully identified germline APC mutations in 87 percent of the 62 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The protein and allele-specific--expression assays provide a practical and sensitive method for molecular diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis. This approach will facilitate care, allowing routine testing of subjects at risk and genetic confirmation of spontaneous mutations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199312303292702

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 599

Metadata

Authors
Powell, S. M., Petersen, G. M., Krush, A. J., Booker, S., Jen, J., Giardiello, F. M., Hamilton, S. R., Vogelstein, B., & Kinzler, K. W.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1993-12-30
Volume
329
Issue
27
Pages
1982-1987
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W4249263639
Cited by
599
References
1
FWCI
30.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Diagnosis of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199312303292702
The paper
Powell, S. M., Petersen, G. M., Krush, A. J., Booker, S., Jen, J., Giardiello, F. M., Hamilton, S. R., Vogelstein, B., & Kinzler, K. W. (1993). Molecular Diagnosis of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199312303292702

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.