The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chemosensitivity and Perception of Dyspnea in Patients with a History of Near-Fatal Asthma
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Many deaths from attacks of asthma may be preventable. However, the difficulty in preventing fatal attacks is that not all the pathophysiologic risk factors have been identified. METHODS: To examine whether dyspnea and chemosensitivity to hypoxia and hypercapnia are factors in fatal asthma attacks, we studied 11 patients with asthma who had had near-fatal attacks, 11 patients with asthma who had not had near-fatal attacks, and 16 normal subjects. Their respiratory responses to hypoxia and hypercapnia, determined by the standard rebreathing technique while the patients were in remission, were assessed in terms of the slopes of ventilation and airway occlusion pressure as a function of the percentage of arterial oxygen saturation and end-tidal carbon dioxide tension, respectively. The perception of dyspnea was scored on the Borg scale during breathing through inspiratory resistances ranging from 0 to 30.9 cm of water per liter per second. RESULTS: The mean (+/- SD) hypoxic ventilatory response (0.14 +/- 0.12 liter per minute per percent of arterial oxygen saturation) and airway occlusion pressure (0.05 +/- 0.05 cm of water per percent of arterial oxygen saturation) were significantly lower in the patients with near-fatal asthma than in the normal subjects (0.60 +/- 0.35, P < 0.001, and 0.16 +/- 0.08, P < 0.001, respectively) and the patients with asthma who had not had near-fatal attacks (0.46 +/- 0.29, P = 0.003, and 0.15 +/- 0.09, P = 0.004). The Borg score was also significantly lower in the patients with near-fatal asthma than in the normal subjects, and their lower hypoxic response was coupled with a blunted perception of dyspnea. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced chemosensitivity to hypoxia and blunted perception of dyspnea may predispose patients to fatal asthma attacks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dyspnea: Mechanisms, Assessment, and Management: A Consensus Statement
(1999) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.159.1.ats898 · Cited by 1,052
The multiple dimensions of dyspnea: Review and hypotheses
Lansing, R. W., Gracely, R. H., & Banzett, R. B. (2009) · Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.resp.2008.07.012 · Cited by 355
Wenzel, S. (2005) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200409-1181pp · Cited by 309
Risk Factors for Near-fatal Asthma: A Case–Control Study in Hospitalized Patients with Asthma
TURNER, M. O., NOERTJOJO, K., VEDAL, S., BAI, T., CRUMP, S., & MARK FITZGERALD, J. (1998) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.157.6.9708092 · Cited by 275
Corry, D. B., Rishi, K., Kanellis, J., Kiss, A., Song, L.-Z., Xu, J., Feng, L., Werb, Z., & Kheradmand, F. (2002) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni773 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Kikuchi, Y., Okabe, S., Tamura, G., Hida, W., Homma, M., Shirato, K., & Takishima, T.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1994-05-12
- Volume
- 330
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 1329-1334
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2014468450
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemosensitivity and Perception of Dyspnea in Patients with a History of Near-Fatal Asthma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199405123301901
- The paper
- Kikuchi, Y., Okabe, S., Tamura, G., Hida, W., Homma, M., Shirato, K., & Takishima, T. (1994). Chemosensitivity and Perception of Dyspnea in Patients with a History of Near-Fatal Asthma. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199405123301901
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.