Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,107

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Ewing Family of Tumors -- A Subgroup of Small-Round-Cell Tumors Defined by Specific Chimeric Transcripts

Open access
Delattre, Olivier, Zucman, Jessica, Melot, Thomas, Garau, Xavier Sastre, Zucker, Jean-Michel, Lenoir, Gilbert M., Ambros, Peter F., Sheer, Denise, Turc-Carel, Claude, Triche, Timothy J., Aurias, Alain, Thomas, Gilles·1994·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Precise diagnosis of small-round-cell tumors is often a challenge to the pathologist and the clinical oncologist. In Ewing's sarcomas and related peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors, a t(11;22) translocation or a (21,22) rearrangement is associated with hybrid transcripts of the EWS gene with the FLI1 or ERG gene. To investigate the diagnostic implication of this observation, we searched for these hybrid transcripts in tumors from patients with clinical and radiologic features of Ewing's sarcoma or peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors. METHODS: Samples of RNA from 114 tumors were reverse transcribed and subjected to the polymerase chain reaction with primers designed to amplify the relevant chimeric transcripts. All amplified products were sequenced. RESULTS: In-frame hybrid transcripts were observed in 89 cases. A hybrid transcript was found in 83 of 87 cases (95 percent) of Ewing's sarcoma or peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors. Samples of RNA from all of 12 tumors that had been proved to be other than Ewing's sarcoma or neuroectodermal tumors had no hybrid transcript. However, 6 of 15 undifferentiated tumors whose type was ambiguous (nonsecreting, poorly differentiated neuroblastoma or undifferentiated sarcoma) contained a hybrid transcript, suggesting that they might have to be reclassified. CONCLUSIONS: A subgroup of small-round-cell tumors identified as belonging to the Ewing family of tumors can be defined according to a specific molecular genetic lesion that is detectable by a rapid, reliable, and efficient method. This approach can be applied to small specimens obtained by fine-needle biopsies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199408043310503

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,107

Metadata

Authors
Delattre, O., Zucman, J., Melot, T., Garau, X. S., Zucker, J.-M., Lenoir, G. M., Ambros, P. F., Sheer, D., Turc-Carel, C., Triche, T. J., Aurias, A., & Thomas, G.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1994-08-04
Volume
331
Issue
5
Pages
294-299
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2317345315
Cited by
1,107
References
1
FWCI
36.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Ewing Family of Tumors -- A Subgroup of Small-Round-Cell Tumors Defined by Specific Chimeric Transcripts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199408043310503
The paper
Delattre, O., Zucman, J., Melot, T., Garau, X. S., Zucker, J.-M., Lenoir, G. M., Ambros, P. F., Sheer, D., Turc-Carel, C., Triche, T. J., Aurias, A., & Thomas, G. (1994). The Ewing Family of Tumors -- A Subgroup of Small-Round-Cell Tumors Defined by Specific Chimeric Transcripts. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199408043310503

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.