The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum in Healthy Volunteers
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Small numbers of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts can contaminate even treated drinking water, and ingestion of oocysts can cause diarrheal disease in normal as well as immunocompromised hosts. Since the number of organisms necessary to cause infection in humans is unknown, we performed a study to determine the infective dose of the parasite in healthy adults. METHODS: After providing informed consent, 29 healthy volunteers without evidence of previous C. parvum infection, as determined by the absence of anti-cryptosporidium-specific antibodies, were given a single dose of 30 to 1 million C. parvum oocysts obtained from a calf. They were then monitored for oocyst excretion and clinical illness for eight weeks. Household contacts were monitored for secondary spread. RESULTS: Of the 16 subjects who received an intended dose of 300 or more oocysts, 14 (88 percent) became infected. After a dose of 30 oocysts, one of five subjects (20 percent) became infected, whereas at a dose of 1000 or more oocysts, seven of seven became infected. The median infective dose, calculated by linear regression, was 132 oocysts. Of the 18 subjects who excreted oocysts after the challenge dose, 11 had enteric symptoms and 7 (39 percent) had clinical cryptosporidiosis, consisting of diarrhea plus at least one other enteric symptom. All recovered, and there were no secondary cases of diarrhea among household contacts. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy adults with no serologic evidence of past infection with C. parvum, a low dose of C. parvum oocysts is sufficient to cause infection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Epidemiology of Cryptosporidium: transmission, detection and identification
Fayer, R., Morgan, U., & Upton, S. J. (2000) · International Journal for Parasitology · doi:10.1016/s0020-7519(00)00135-1 · Cited by 938
Virulence of Three Distinct Cryptosporidium parvum Isolates for Healthy Adults
Okhuysen, P. C., Chappell, C. L., Crabb, J. H., Sterling, C. R., & DuPont, H. L. (1999) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/315033 · Cited by 466
Self-citationZoonotic protozoa: from land to sea
Fayer, R., Dubey, J. P., & Lindsay, D. S. (2004) · Trends in Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.pt.2004.08.008 · Cited by 342
Wastewater Irrigation: The State of Play
Hamilton, A. J., Stagnitti, F., Xiong, X., Kreidl, S. L., Benke, K. K., & Maher, P. (2007) · Vadose Zone Journal · doi:10.2136/vzj2007.0026 · Cited by 281
Outbreaks associated with recreational water in the United States
Craun *, G. F., Calderon, R. L., & Craun, M. F. (2005) · International Journal of Environmental Health Research · doi:10.1080/09603120500155716 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- DuPont, H. L., Chappell, C. L., Sterling, C. R., Okhuysen, P. C., Rose, J. B., & Jakubowski, W.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1995-03-30
- Volume
- 332
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 855-859
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2334039896
- Cited by
- 889
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum in Healthy Volunteers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199503303321304
- The paper
- DuPont, H. L., Chappell, C. L., Sterling, C. R., Okhuysen, P. C., Rose, J. B., & Jakubowski, W. (1995). The Infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum in Healthy Volunteers. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199503303321304
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.