Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 251

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Longevity and Medicare Expenditures

Lubitz, James, Beebe, James, Baker, Colin·1995·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the United States, the elderly account for over one third of health care spending. The total population over the age of 65 is projected to increase, as is life expectancy beyond the age of 65. We studied current patterns of Medicare expenses according to age at death and the possible effect of future demographic changes on Medicare spending. METHODS: We used data from the Medicare program to estimate lifetime Medicare expenses for a sample of 129,166 beneficiaries, 65 or older, who died in 1989 and 1990, according to age at death. Spending for nursing home care not covered by Medicare was excluded. (Nursing home costs represent about 20 percent of total health care spending for the elderly and increase with age.) Through simulation, we assessed the lifetime payments by Medicare for enrollees who turned 65 in 1990 and those who will do so in 2020. RESULTS: Estimated lifetime Medicare payments (in 1990 dollars) ranged from $13,044 for persons who died at 65 years of age, to $56,094 for those who died at 80, to $65,633 for those who died at 101 or older. The payments associated with an additional year of life and the average annual payments over an enrolle's lifetime both decreased as the age at death increased. The estimated 7.9 percent increase in life expectancy beyond 65 years that will have taken place between 1990 and 2020 (19.1 years past the age of 65 in 2020, as compared with 17.7 years in 1990) was associated with an estimated increase of 2.0 percent in lifetime Medicare payments. Of the estimated $98 billion increase in total lifetime payments (in 1990 dollars) from the 1990 group to the 2020 group, 74.3 percent was due to the larger size of the original birth cohort who will reach the age of 65 in 2020, 22.5 percent to an increase in the proportion of that birth cohort projected to survive to 65 years of age, and 3.2 percent to improved life expectancy beyond 65. CONCLUSIONS: The effect on Medicare spending of increased longevity beyond the age of 65 may not be great. Total Medicare payments will be more substantially affected by the expected increase in the absolute number of elderly people.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199504133321506

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 251

Metadata

Authors
Lubitz, J., Beebe, J., & Baker, C.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1995-04-13
Volume
332
Issue
15
Pages
999-1003
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2004656203
Cited by
251
References
2
FWCI
46.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Longevity and Medicare Expenditures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199504133321506
The paper
Lubitz, J., Beebe, J., & Baker, C. (1995). Longevity and Medicare Expenditures. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199504133321506

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.