Cited by 186Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthReproductive Health and ContraceptionLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

First sexual intercourse: age, coercion, and later regrets reported by a birth cohort

Open access
Dickson, Nigel, Paul, Charlotte, Herbison, Peter, Silva, Phil·1998·BMJ

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate how age at first sexual intercourse is related to the reported circumstances and to determine how these corresponded to views in early adulthood about its timing. Design: Cross sectional study within a birth cohort using a questionnaire presented by computer. Setting: Dunedin, New Zealand in 1993-4. Subjects: 477 men and 458 women enrolled in the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study, comprising 92% of survivors of the cohort. Results: The median age at first intercourse was 17 years for men and 16 years for women. Only one man (0.2%) but 30 (7%) women reported being forced to have intercourse on the first occasion. For women, there were increasing rates of coercion with younger age at first intercourse. More men than women reported that they and their partner were equally willing (77% (316/413) v 53% (222/419)). Mutual willingness of both partners was greater for those who reported that it was also the first time for their partner. Timing of first intercourse was considered about right by 49% (200/411) of men and 38% (148/388) of women. Many women (54% (211/388) reported that they should have waited longer, and this rose to 70% (90/129) for women reporting intercourse before age 16. Conclusions: Most women regretted having sexual intercourse before age 16. First intercourse at younger ages is associated with risks that are shared unequally between men and women. This information is important to young people themselves. Key messages: We questioned a cohort of young New Zealand adults about the circumstances of their first sexual intercourse and their views about the timing of first intercourse Median age at first intercourse was 17 years for men and 16 years for women. Being forced at first intercourse was commonly reported by women, especially those who experienced intercourse before age 14, and most women who had intercourse before age 16 reported that they should have waited longer More men than women said that both they and their partner were equally willing at first intercourse, and reporting of equal willingness was greater among those who reported that it was also the first sexual intercourse for their partner As well as pronounced gender differences in mutual willingness and retrospective views of appropriate timing, more women reported occurrence of sexually transmitted disease, especially among those who had intercourse before age 16

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.316.7124.29

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Stuart-Smith S. Teenage sex. BMJ 1996;312:390-1.
  2. Hayes CD, ed. Risking the future. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1987.
  3. Laumann EO, Gagnon JH, Michael RT, Michaels S. The social organisation of sexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
  4. Faculty of Public Health Medicine. Sex education for young people: a background review. London: Faculty of Public Health Medicine, 1995. (Guidelines for Health Promotion No 42.)
  5. Kraft P. Age of first intercourse among Norwegian adolescents: a lifetime perspective. Soc Sci Med 1991;2:207-13.
  6. Centres for Disease Control. Sexual behaviour among high school students. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ 1992;40:885-8.
  7. Paul C, Dickson NP, Davis PB, Yee RL, Chetwynd J, McMillan N. Hetero- sexual behaviour and HIV risk in New Zealand. Aust J Public Health 1995;19:13-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dickson, N., Paul, C., Herbison, P., & Silva, P.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Dickson, Nigel
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1998-01-03
Volume
316
Issue
7124
Pages
29-33
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2088882541
Cited by
186
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 14
FWCI
14.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Health Research Council of New Zealand
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Keywords
age at first sexual intercourse, sexual coercion, sexual regret, gender differences, sexually transmitted infections, adolescent sexual behavior, Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Attitude to Health, Coercion, Coitus, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, New Zealand, Sex Factors, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review