The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anal Dynamic Graciloplasty in the Treatment of Intractable Fecal Incontinence
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: In patients with intractable fecal incontinence, conventional treatment is not always successful. Dynamic graciloplasty (transposition of the gracilis muscle to the anus with the implantation of stimulating electrodes) was developed to provide such patients with functional neosphincters. We evaluated the clinical results of this new surgical approach and the effects on quality of life. METHODS: We treated 52 patients with dynamic graciloplasty. The clinical results of treatment were evaluated in an interview, by anal manometry, and by enema testing. The degree of continence was scored. To assess quality of life, four questionnaires were administered (parts 1 and 2 of the Nottingham Health Profile, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and the Self-rating Depression scale). RESULTS: Among the 52 patients, 38 (73 percent) were continent after a median follow-up of 2.1 years. At 52 weeks the patients' condition had improved with respect to the median frequency of defecation (from five to two times per 24 hours, P < 0.001), the median time defecation could be postponed (from 9 seconds to 19 minutes, P = 0.012), and the median time an enema could be retained (from 0 to 180 seconds, P = 0.005). Patients in whom the technique was successful became less anxious than those in whom it failed (P = 0.002) and improved with regard to effectiveness in their occupations, ability to perform tasks around the home, personal relationships, sexual function, and social life (P = 0.01). They also became less isolated socially (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic graciloplasty is a safe and reliable technique in patients with severe incontinence and may result in a better quality of life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A self-rating depression scale
ZUNG, W. W. K. (1965) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1965.01720310065008 · Cited by 9,813
Cited by
Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems
Vaizey, C. J., Carapeti, E., Cahill, J. A., & Kamm, M. A. (1999) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.44.1.77 · Cited by 1,372
Pathophysiology and management of bowel dysfunction in multiple sclerosis
Wiesel, P. H., Norton, C., Glickman, S., & Kamm, M. A. (2001) · European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1097/00042737-200104000-00025 · Cited by 121
Comparison of epineural or intramuscular nerve electrodes for stimulated graciloplasty
Konsten, J., Rongen, M. J., Ogunbiyi, O. A., Darakhshan, A., Baeten, C. G. M. I., & Williams, N. S. (2001) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/bf02234333 · Cited by 20
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Baeten, C. G. M. I., Geerdes, B. P., Adang, E. M. M., Heineman, E., Konsten, J., Engel, G. L., Kester, A. D. M., Spaans, F., & Soeters, P. B.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1995-06-15
- Volume
- 332
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 1600-1605
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2139006310
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anal Dynamic Graciloplasty in the Treatment of Intractable Fecal Incontinence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199506153322403
- The paper
- Baeten, C. G. M. I., Geerdes, B. P., Adang, E. M. M., Heineman, E., Konsten, J., Engel, G. L., Kester, A. D. M., Spaans, F., & Soeters, P. B. (1995). Anal Dynamic Graciloplasty in the Treatment of Intractable Fecal Incontinence. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199506153322403
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.