The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High Survival Rates of Kidney Transplants from Spousal and Living Unrelated Donors
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: In the United States, increasing numbers of persons are donating kidneys to their spouses. Despite greater histoincompatibility, the survival rates of these kidneys are higher than those of cadaveric kidneys. We examined the factors influencing the high survival rates of spousal-donor kidneys. METHODS: Kidney-transplant data from the United Network for Organ Sharing Renal Transplant Registry were used to calculate graft-survival rates with Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The three-year survival rates were 85 percent for kidneys from 368 spouses, 81 percent for kidneys from 129 living unrelated donors who were not married to the recipients, 82 percent for kidneys from 3368 parents, and 70 percent for 43,341 cadaveric kidneys. The three-year survival rate for wife-to-husband grafts was 87 percent, which was the same as for husband-to-wife grafts if the wife had never been pregnant. If the wife had previously been pregnant, the three-year graft-survival rate was 76 percent (P = 0.40). The three-year graft-survival rate among recipients of spousal grafts who did not receive transfusions preoperatively was 81 percent, as compared with 90 percent for recipients who received 1 to 10 transfusions preoperatively (P = 0.008). The superior survival rate of grafts from unrelated donors could not be attributed to better HLA matching, white race, younger donor age, or shorter cold-ischemia times, but might be explained by damage due to shock before removal in 10 percent of the cadaveric kidneys. CONCLUSIONS: Spouses are an important source of living-donor kidney grafts because, despite poor HLA matching, the graft-survival rate is similar to that of parental-donor kidneys. This high rate of survival is attributed to the fact that the kidneys were uniformly healthy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chronic Kidney Disease Diagnosis and Management: A Review
Chen, T. K., Knicely, D. H., & Grams, M. E. (2019) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.14745 · Cited by 1,811
Rejection of the Kidney Allograft
Nankivell, B. J., & Alexander, S. I. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0902927 · Cited by 605
The HLA system: Genetics, immunology, clinical testing, and clinical implications
Choo, S. Y. (2007) · Yonsei Medical Journal · doi:10.3349/ymj.2007.48.1.11 · Cited by 446
Chetboun, M., Drumez, E., Ballou, C., Maanaoui, M., Payne, E., Barton, F., Kerr-Conte, J., Vantyghem, M.-C., Piemonti, L., Rickels, M. R., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(23)00082-7 · Cited by 64
Brain-kidney cross-talk: Definition and emerging evidence
Afsar, B., Sag, A. A., Yalcin, C. E., Kaya, E., Siriopol, D., Goldsmith, D., Covic, A., & Kanbay, M. (2016) · European Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2016.07.032 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Terasaki, P. I., Cecka, J. M., Gjertson, D. W., & Takemoto, S.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1995-08-10
- Volume
- 333
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 333-336
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W1990038658
- Cited by
- 1,213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High Survival Rates of Kidney Transplants from Spousal and Living Unrelated Donors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199508103330601
- The paper
- Terasaki, P. I., Cecka, J. M., Gjertson, D. W., & Takemoto, S. (1995). High Survival Rates of Kidney Transplants from Spousal and Living Unrelated Donors. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199508103330601
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.