Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,070

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Timing of Sexual Intercourse in Relation to Ovulation — Effects on the Probability of Conception, Survival of the Pregnancy, and Sex of the Baby

Wilcox, Allen J., Weinberg, Clarice R., Baird, Donna D.·1995·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation strongly influences the chance of conception, although the actual number of fertile days in a woman's menstrual cycle is uncertain. The timing of intercourse may also be associated with the sex of the baby. METHODS: We recruited 221 healthy women who were planning to become pregnant. At the same time the women stopped using birth-control methods, they began collecting daily urine specimens and keeping daily records of whether they had sexual intercourse. We measured estrogen and progesterone metabolites in urine to estimate the day of ovulation. RESULTS: In a total of 625 menstrual cycles for which the dates of ovulation could be estimated, 192 pregnancies were initiated, as indicated by increases in the urinary concentration of human chorionic gonadotropin around the expected time of implantation. Two thirds (n = 129) ended in live births. Conception occurred only when intercourse took place during a six-day period that ended on the estimated day of ovulation. The probability of conception ranged from 0.10 when intercourse occurred five days before ovulation to 0.33 when it occurred on the day of ovulation itself. There was no evident relation between the age of sperm and the viability of the conceptus, although only 6 percent of the pregnancies could be firmly attributed to sperm that were three or more days old. Cycles producing male and female babies had similar patterns of intercourse in relation to ovulation. CONCLUSIONS: Among healthy women trying to conceive, nearly all pregnancies can be attributed to intercourse during a six-day period ending on the day of ovulation. For practical purposes, the timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation has no influence on the sex of the baby.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199512073332301

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Potter RG, 1961, Milbank Q, 39, 132, 10.2307/3348639 · doi:10.2307/3348639
  2. Bongaarts J. The proximate determinants of natural marital fertility. In: Bulatao RA, Lee RD, Hollerbach PE, Bongaarts J, eds. Determinants of fertility in developing countries. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press, 1983:103-38.
  3. 1983, Fertil Steril, 40, 773, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)47478-9 · DOI
  4. France JT, 1992, Int J Fertil, 37, 244
  5. Wilcox AJ, 1985, Fertil Steril, 44, 366, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)48862-X · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0039-128X(78)90053-3 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0022-4731(79)90169-9 · DOI
  8. 10.1097/00001648-199509000-00015 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/0039-128X(94)90029-9 · DOI
  10. 10.2307/2530453 · DOI
  11. 10.1210/jcem-59-5-867 · DOI
  12. 10.2307/2172882 · doi:10.2307/2172882
  13. 10.2307/2175195 · DOI
  14. 10.2307/2533379 · DOI
  15. Check JH, 1989, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 160, 598, 10.1016/S0002-9378(89)80036-5 · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(89)80036-5
  16. 10.1097/00001648-199009000-00008 · DOI
  17. MacLeod J, 1952, Fertil Steril, 3, 297, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)30962-1 · DOI
  18. 10.1530/jrf.0.0040143 · DOI
  19. Poland ML, 1985, Fertil Steril, 44, 396, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)48866-7 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/BF01849266 · DOI
  21. Campbell KL, 1985, Res Front Fertil Regul, 3, 1
  22. Perloff WH, 1964, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 88, 439, 10.1016/0002-9378(64)90499-5 · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(64)90499-5
  23. Cohen J, 1985, Fertil Steril, 44, 254, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)48747-9 · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48747-9
  24. 1984, Fertil Steril, 41, 593, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)47783-6 · DOI
  25. 10.1056/NEJM197509182931202 · DOI
  26. Zarutskie PW, 1989, Fertil Steril, 52, 891, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)53148-3 · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53148-3
  27. Weinberg CR, 1995, Hum Reprod, 10, 304, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135932 · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135932

Cited by

See all 1,070

Metadata

Authors
Wilcox, A. J., Weinberg, C. R., & Baird, D. D.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1995-12-07
Volume
333
Issue
23
Pages
1517-1521
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2326648248
Cited by
1,070
References
2
FWCI
21.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Timing of Sexual Intercourse in Relation to Ovulation — Effects on the Probability of Conception, Survival of the Pregnancy, and Sex of the Baby. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199512073332301
The paper
Wilcox, A. J., Weinberg, C. R., & Baird, D. D. (1995). Timing of Sexual Intercourse in Relation to Ovulation — Effects on the Probability of Conception, Survival of the Pregnancy, and Sex of the Baby. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199512073332301

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.