Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 462

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improvement in Pulmonary Function and Elastic Recoil after Lung-Reduction Surgery for Diffuse Emphysema

Open access
Sciurba, Frank C., Rogers, Robert M., Keenan, Robert J., Slivka, William A., Gorcsan, John, Ferson, Peter F., Holbert, John M., Brown, Manuel L., Landreneau, Rodney J.·1996·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary function may improve after surgical resection of the most severely affected lung tissue (lung-reduction surgery) in patients with diffuse emphysema. The basic mechanisms responsible for the improvement, however, are not known. METHODS: We studied 20 patients with diffuse emphysema before and at least three months after either a unilateral or a bilateral lung-reduction procedure. Clinical benefit was assessed by measurement of the six-minute walking distance and the transitional-dyspnea index, which is a subjective rating of the change from base line in functional impairment and the threshold for effort- and task- dependent dyspnea. Pressure-volume relations in the lungs were measured with static expiratory esophageal-balloon techniques, and right ventricular systolic function was assessed by echocardiography. RESULTS: The patients had significant improvement in the transitional-dyspnea index after surgery (P<0.001). The mean (+/-SD) coefficient of retraction, an indicator of elastic recoil of the lung, improved (from 1.3+/-0.6 cm of water per liter before surgery to 1.8+/-0.8 after, P<0.001). Sixteen patients with increased elastic recoil had a greater increase in the distance walked in six minutes than the other four patients, in whom recoil did not increase (P=0.02). The improved lung recoil led to disproportionate decreases in residual volume as compared with total lung capacity (16 percent vs. 6 percent), but the decreases in both values were significant (P<0.001). Forced expiratory volume in one second increased (from 0.87+/-0.36 to 1.11+/-0.45 liters, P<0.001). End-expiratory esophageal pressure also decreased (P=0.002). These improvements in lung mechanics led to a decrease in arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide form 42+/-6 to 38+/-5 mm Hg (P=0.006). Furthermore, the fractional change in right ventricular area, an indicator of systolic function, increased from 0.33+/-0.11 to 0.38+/-0.010 (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Lung-reduction surgery can produce increases in the elastic recoil of the lung in patients with diffuse emphysema, leading to short-term improvement in dyspnea and exercise tolerance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199604253341704

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 462

Metadata

Authors
Sciurba, F. C., Rogers, R. M., Keenan, R. J., Slivka, W. A., Gorcsan, J., Ferson, P. F., Holbert, J. M., Brown, M. L., & Landreneau, R. J.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1996-04-25
Volume
334
Issue
17
Pages
1095-1099
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2144618929
Cited by
462
References
24
FWCI
60.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improvement in Pulmonary Function and Elastic Recoil after Lung-Reduction Surgery for Diffuse Emphysema. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199604253341704
The paper
Sciurba, F. C., Rogers, R. M., Keenan, R. J., Slivka, W. A., Gorcsan, J., Ferson, P. F., Holbert, J. M., Brown, M. L., & Landreneau, R. J. (1996). Improvement in Pulmonary Function and Elastic Recoil after Lung-Reduction Surgery for Diffuse Emphysema. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199604253341704

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.