Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,824

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The National Committee for Quality Assurance

Iglehart, John K.·1996·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

The quality of medical care provided by managed-care plans is an increasingly complicated and controversial topic.17 Traditionally, the quality of care has been measured by professional judgment, often rendered subjectively in individual cases.8 Now, as health care delivery and financing are being reordered by the rapid growth of managed care, physicians and the health plans with which they contract are being called to greater account for the quality of the services they provide. The scrutiny is coming largely from corporations and governments, which are concerned that as health plans compete, they may stint on services to reduce prices.9 In . . .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199609263351322

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,824

Metadata

Authors
Iglehart, J. K.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1996-09-26
Volume
335
Issue
13
Pages
995-999
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1965751712
Cited by
1,824
References
0
FWCI
107.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The National Committee for Quality Assurance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199609263351322
The paper
Iglehart, J. K. (1996). The National Committee for Quality Assurance. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199609263351322

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.