The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Catheter-Based Radiotherapy to Inhibit Restenosis after Coronary Stenting
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In animal models of coronary restenosis, intracoronary radiotherapy has been shown to reduce the intimal hyperplasia that is a part of restenosis. We studied the safety and efficacy of catheter-based intracoronary gamma radiation plus stenting to reduce coronary restenosis in patients with previous restenosis. METHODS: Patients with restenosis underwent coronary stenting, as required, and balloon dilation and were then randomly assigned to receive catheter-based irradiation with iridium-192 or placebo. Clinical follow-up was performed, with quantitative coronary angiographic and intravascular ultrasonographic measurements at six months. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled; 26 were assigned to the iridium-192 group and 29 to the placebo group. Angiographic studies were performed in 53 patients (96 percent) at a mean (+/-SD) of 6.7+/-2.2 months. The mean minimal luminal diameter at follow-up was larger in the iridium-192 group than in the placebo group (2.43+/-0.78 mm vs. 1.85+/-0.89 mm, P=0.02). Late luminal loss was significantly lower in the iridium-192 group than in the placebo group (0.38+/-1.06 mm vs. 1.03+/-0.97 mm, P=0.03). Angiographically identified restenosis (stenosis of 50 percent or more of the luminal diameter at follow-up) occurred in 17 percent of the patients in the iridium-192 group, as compared with 54 percent of those in the placebo group (P= 0.01). There were no apparent complications of the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary, short-term study of patients with previous coronary restenosis, coronary stenting followed by catheter-based intracoronary radiotherapy substantially reduced the rate of subsequent restenosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Angiographic Patterns of In-Stent Restenosis: Classification and Implications for Long-Term Outcome
Mehran, R., Dangas, G., Abizaid, A. S., Mintz, G. S., Lansky, A. J., Satler, L. F., Pichard, A. D., Kent, K. M., Stone, G. W., & Leon, M. B. (1999) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.100.18.1872 · Cited by 1,258
Self-citationSmith, S. C., Dove, J. T., Jacobs, A. K., Kennedy, J. W., Kereiakes, D., Kern, M. J., Kuntz, R. E., Popma, J. J., Schaff, H. V., Williams, D. O., et al. (2001) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.103.24.3019 · Cited by 608
Self-citationCoronary in-stent restenosis: Current status and future strategies
Lowe, H. C., Oesterle, S. N., & Khachigian, L. M. (2002) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01742-9 · Cited by 414
The Road to Bioabsorbable Stents: Reaching Clinical Reality?
Erne, P., Schier, M., & Resink, T. J. (2006) · CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00270-004-0341-9 · Cited by 249
Metadata
- Authors
- Teirstein, P. S., Massullo, V., Jani, S., Popma, J. J., Mintz, G. S., Russo, R. J., Schatz, R. A., Guarneri, E. M., Steuterman, S., Morris, N. B., Leon, M. B., & Tripuraneni, P.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1997-06-12
- Volume
- 336
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 1697-1703
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2339020512
- Cited by
- 942
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 115.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Catheter-Based Radiotherapy to Inhibit Restenosis after Coronary Stenting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199706123362402
- The paper
- Teirstein, P. S., Massullo, V., Jani, S., Popma, J. J., Mintz, G. S., Russo, R. J., Schatz, R. A., Guarneri, E. M., Steuterman, S., Morris, N. B., Leon, M. B., & Tripuraneni, P. (1997). Catheter-Based Radiotherapy to Inhibit Restenosis after Coronary Stenting. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199706123362402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.