Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 486

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stent Placement Compared with Balloon Angioplasty for Obstructed Coronary Bypass Grafts

Open access
Savage, Michael P., Douglas, John S., Fischman, David L., Pepine, Carl J., King, Spencer B., Werner, Jeffrey A., Bailey, Steven R., Overlie, Paul A., Fenton, Sarah H., Brinker, Jeffrey A., Leon, Martin B., Goldberg, Sheldon, Heuser, Richard, Smalling, Richard, Safian, Robert D., Cleman, Michael, Buchbinder, Maurice, Snead, David, Rake, Randal C., Gebhardt, Sharon·1997·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of stenosis in saphenous-vein grafts after coronary-artery bypass surgery is a difficult challenge. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of stent placement with those of balloon angioplasty on clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients with obstructive disease of saphenous-vein grafts. METHODS: A total of 220 patients with new lesions in aortocoronary-venous bypass grafts were randomly assigned to placement of Palmaz-Schatz stents or standard balloon angioplasty. Coronary angiography was performed during the index procedure and six months later. RESULTS: As compared with the patients assigned to angioplasty, those assigned to stenting had a higher rate of procedural efficacy, defined as a reduction in stenosis to less than 50 percent of the vessel diameter without a major cardiac complication (92 percent vs. 69 percent, P<0.001), but they had more frequent hemorrhagic complications (17 percent vs. 5 percent, P<0.01). Patients in the stent group had a larger mean (+/-SD) increase in luminal diameter immediately after the procedure (1.92+/-0.30 mm, as compared with 1.21+/-0.37 mm in the angioplasty group; P<0.001) and a greater mean net gain in luminal diameter at six months (0.85+/-0.96 vs. 0.54+/-0.91 mm, P=0.002). Restenosis occurred in 37 percent of the patients in the stent group and in 46 percent of the patients in the angioplasty group (P=0.24). The outcome in terms of freedom from death, myocardial infarction, repeated bypass surgery, or revascularization of the target lesion was significantly better in the stent group (73 percent vs. 58 percent, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with balloon angioplasty, stenting of selected venous bypass-graft lesions resulted in superior procedural outcomes, a larger gain in luminal diameter, and a reduction in major cardiac events. However, there was no significant benefit in the rate of angiographic restenosis, which was the primary end point of the study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199709113371103

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 486

Metadata

Authors
Savage, M. P., Douglas, J. S., Fischman, D. L., Pepine, C. J., King, S. B., Werner, J. A., Bailey, S. R., Overlie, P. A., Fenton, S. H., Brinker, J. A., Leon, M. B., Goldberg, S., Heuser, R., Smalling, R., Safian, R. D., Cleman, M., Buchbinder, M., Snead, D., Rake, R. C., & Gebhardt, S.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1997-09-11
Volume
337
Issue
11
Pages
740-747
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2329072970
Cited by
486
References
10
FWCI
44.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stent Placement Compared with Balloon Angioplasty for Obstructed Coronary Bypass Grafts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199709113371103
The paper
Savage, M. P., Douglas, J. S., Fischman, D. L., Pepine, C. J., King, S. B., Werner, J. A., Bailey, S. R., Overlie, P. A., Fenton, S. H., Brinker, J. A., Leon, M. B., Goldberg, S., Heuser, R., Smalling, R., Safian, R. D., Cleman, M., Buchbinder, M., Snead, D., Rake, R. C., & Gebhardt, S. (1997). Stent Placement Compared with Balloon Angioplasty for Obstructed Coronary Bypass Grafts. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199709113371103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.