Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,745

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adjuvant Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in Node-Positive Premenopausal Women with Breast Cancer

Open access
Ragaz, Joseph, Jackson, Stewart M., Le, Nhu, Plenderleith, Ian H., Spinelli, John J., Basco, Vivian E., Wilson, Kenneth S., Knowling, Margaret A., Coppin, Christopher M.L., Paradis, Marilyn, Coldman, Andrew J., Olivotto, Ivo A.·1997·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy after mastectomy to treat early breast cancer has been known since the 1940s to reduce rates of local relapse. However, the routine use of postoperative radiotherapy began to decline in the 1980s because it failed to improve overall survival. We prospectively tested the efficacy of combining radiotherapy with chemotherapy. METHODS: From 1978 through 1986, 318 premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer were randomly assigned, after modified radical mastectomy, to receive chemotherapy plus radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone. Radiotherapy was given to the chest wall and locoregional lymph nodes between the fourth and fifth cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil. RESULTS: After 15 years of follow-up, the women assigned to chemotherapy plus radiotherapy had a 33 percent reduction in the rate of recurrence (relative risk, 0.67; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.50 to 0.90) and a 29 percent reduction in mortality from breast cancer (relative risk, 0.71; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.51 to 0.99), as compared with the women treated with chemotherapy alone. CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy after modified radical mastectomy decreases rates of locoregional and systemic relapse and reduces mortality from breast cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199710023371402

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.1056/NEJM199511303332202 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Cuzick J, 1994, J Clin Oncol, 12, 447, 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.3.447 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/0360-3016(77)90128-6 · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(77)90128-6
  4. 10.1016/0360-3016(92)90784-F · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/0167-8140(92)90190-6 · DOI
  6. 10.1056/NEJM197501162920301 · doi:10.1056/nejm197501162920301
  7. 10.1056/NEJM197602192940801 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1002/1097-0142(197806)41:6<2088::AID-CNCR2820410604>3.0.CO;2-J · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(197806)41:6<2088::aid-cncr2820410604>3.0.co;2-j
  9. Schabel FM, 1976, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 126, 500, 10.2214/ajr.126.3.500 · doi:10.2214/ajr.126.3.500
  10. Skipper HE, 1970, Cancer Chemother Rep, 54, 431
  11. Durand RE, 1986, J Natl Cancer Inst, 77, 247
  12. 10.1002/1097-0142(19850501)55:9+<2131::AID-CNCR2820551416>3.0.CO;2-Q · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19850501)55:9+<2131::aid-cncr2820551416>3.0.co;2-q
  13. 10.1002/1097-0142(19850501)55:9+<2123::AID-CNCR2820551415>3.0.CO;2-O · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19850501)55:9+<2123::aid-cncr2820551415>3.0.co;2-o
  14. Vokes EE, 1990, J Clin Oncol, 8, 911, 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.5.911 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Goldie JH, 1979, Cancer Treat Rep, 63, 1727
  16. Meakin JW, 1979, Can Med Assoc J, 120, 1221
  17. 10.2307/2281868 · doi:10.2307/2281868 · Paper page
  18. 10.1136/bmj.298.6688.1611 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/S0959-8049(05)80012-7 · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(05)80012-7
  20. 10.1002/bjs.1800730407 · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800730407
  21. 10.1007/BF01980937 · doi:10.1007/bf01980937
  22. Griem KL, 1987, J Clin Oncol, 5, 1546, 10.1200/JCO.1987.5.10.1546 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/bjc.1992.430 · doi:10.1038/bjc.1992.430
  24. 10.1016/0959-8049(92)90015-T · DOI
  25. 10.1002/1097-0142(19840201)53:3<384::AID-CNCR2820530303>3.0.CO;2-G · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19840201)53:3<384::aid-cncr2820530303>3.0.co;2-g
  26. Arriagada R, 1995, J Clin Oncol, 13, 2869, 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.12.2869 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Fisher B, Redmond C. Lumpectomy for breast cancer: an update of the NSABP experience. In: Consensus Development Conference on the Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute monographs. No. 11. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1992:7-13. (NIH publication no. 90-3187.)
  28. Hermann RE, 1993, Surg Gynecol Obstet, 177, 247
  29. 10.1056/NEJM199306033282202 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/0360-3016(92)90908-Z · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(92)90908-z
  31. Diab SG, 1997, Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 16, 130a

Cited by

See all 1,745

Metadata

Authors
Ragaz, J., Jackson, S. M., Le, N., Plenderleith, I. H., Spinelli, J. J., Basco, V. E., Wilson, K. S., Knowling, M. A., Coppin, C. M. L., Paradis, M., Coldman, A. J., & Olivotto, I. A.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1997-10-02
Volume
337
Issue
14
Pages
956-962
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2036934183
Cited by
1,745
References
2
FWCI
35.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adjuvant Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in Node-Positive Premenopausal Women with Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199710023371402
The paper
Ragaz, J., Jackson, S. M., Le, N., Plenderleith, I. H., Spinelli, J. J., Basco, V. E., Wilson, K. S., Knowling, M. A., Coppin, C. M. L., Paradis, M., Coldman, A. J., & Olivotto, I. A. (1997). Adjuvant Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in Node-Positive Premenopausal Women with Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199710023371402

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.