Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 634

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Use of Alternative Medicine by Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Open access
Burstein, Harold J., Gelber, Shari, Guadagnoli, Edward, Weeks, Jane C.·1999·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We analyzed the use of alternative medicine by women who had received standard therapy for early-stage breast cancer diagnosed between September 1993 and September 1995. METHODS: A cohort of 480 patients with newly diagnosed early-stage breast cancer was recruited from a Massachusetts statewide cohort of women participating in a study of how women choose treatment for cancer. Alternative medical treatments, conventional therapies, and health-related quality of life were examined. RESULTS: New use of alternative medicine after surgery for breast cancer was common (reported by 28.1 percent of the women); such use was not associated with choices about standard medical therapies after we controlled for clinical and sociodemographic variables. A total of 10.6 percent of the women had used alternative medicine before they were given a diagnosis of breast cancer. Women who initiated the use of alternative medicine after surgery reported a worse quality of life than women who never used alternative medicine. Mental health scores were similar at base line among women who decided to use alternative medicine and those who did not, but three months after surgery the use of alternative medicine was independently associated with depression, fear of recurrence of cancer, lower scores for mental health and sexual satisfaction, and more physical symptoms as well as symptoms of greater intensity. All groups of women reported improving quality of life one year after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Among women with newly diagnosed early-stage breast cancer who had been treated with standard therapies, new use of alternative medicine was a marker of greater psychosocial distress and worse quality of life.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199906033402206

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 10.1001/jama.280.18.1569 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.3322/canjclin.42.3.181 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Cassileth BR, 1984, Ann Intern Med, 101, 105, 10.7326/0003-4819-101-1-105 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Downer SM, 1994, BMJ, 309, 86, 10.1136/bmj.309.6947.86 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Risberg T, 1998, J Clin Oncol, 16, 6, 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.6 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0959-8049(97)10043-0 · DOI
  7. Siegel A, 1998, Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 17, 667
  8. VandeCreek L, 1999, Altern Ther Health Med, 5, 71
  9. 10.1002/1097-0142(19840201)53:3+<815::AID-CNCR2820531334>3.0.CO;2-U · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19840201)53:3+<815::aid-cncr2820531334>3.0.co;2-u
  10. Danielson KJ, 1988, CMAJ, 138, 1005
  11. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960315)77:6<1026::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO;2-F · DOI
  12. 10.1056/NEJM199809173391210 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Gevitz N. Three perspectives on unorthodox medicine. In: Gevitz N, ed. Other healers. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988:1-28.
  14. 10.1056/NEJM199809173391213 · doi:10.1056/nejm199809173391213
  15. Guadagnoli E, 1998, J Clin Oncol, 16, 101, 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.101 · DOI
  16. Ganz PA, 1998, J Clin Oncol, 16, 501, 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.2.501 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1093/jnci/87.18.1372 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1002/1097-0142(19920415)69:8<2111::AID-CNCR2820690817>3.0.CO;2-T · DOI
  19. Rowland JH, Massie MJ. Psychologic reactions to breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survival. In: Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Hellman S, eds. Diseases of the breast. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996:919-38.
  20. 10.1002/1097-0142(197905)43:5<1613::AID-CNCR2820430508>3.0.CO;2-8 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1002/1097-0142(19850515)55:10<2506::AID-CNCR2820551033>3.0.CO;2-0 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Mor V, Malin M, Allen S. Age differences in the psychosocial problems encountered by breast cancer patients. In: Journal of National Cancer Institute monographs. No. 16. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1994:191-8. (NIH publication no. 93-03559.)
  23. 10.1097/00005650-199305000-00004 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1002/1097-0142(19920701)70:1<120::AID-CNCR2820700120>3.0.CO;2-U · DOI · Paper page
  25. Schag CAC, 1993, J Clin Oncol, 11, 783, 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.4.783 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 634

Metadata

Authors
Burstein, H. J., Gelber, S., Guadagnoli, E., & Weeks, J. C.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1999-06-03
Volume
340
Issue
22
Pages
1733-1739
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2017955940
Cited by
634
References
5
FWCI
94.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of Alternative Medicine by Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199906033402206
The paper
Burstein, H. J., Gelber, S., Guadagnoli, E., & Weeks, J. C. (1999). Use of Alternative Medicine by Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199906033402206

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.