The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation for Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Complete Remission
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Prophylactic cranial irradiation reduces the incidence of brain metastasis in patients with small-cell lung cancer. Whether this treatment, when given to patients in complete remission, improves survival is not known. We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether prophylactic cranial irradiation prolongs survival. METHODS: We analyzed individual data on 987 patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission who took part in seven trials that compared prophylactic cranial irradiation with no prophylactic cranial irradiation. The main end point was survival. RESULTS: The relative risk of death in the treatment group as compared with the control group was 0.84 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.73 to 0.97; P= 0.01), which corresponds to a 5.4 percent increase in the rate of survival at three years (15.3 percent in the control group vs. 20.7 percent in the treatment group). Prophylactic cranial irradiation also increased the rate of disease-free survival (relative risk of recurrence or death, 0.75; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.65 to 0.86; P<0.001) and decreased the cumulative incidence of brain metastasis (relative risk, 0.46; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.57; P<0.001). Larger doses of radiation led to greater decreases in the risk of brain metastasis, according to an analysis of four total doses (8 Gy, 24 to 25 Gy, 30 Gy, and 36 to 40 Gy) (P for trend=0.02), but the effect on survival did not differ significantly according to the dose. We also identified a trend (P=0.01) toward a decrease in the risk of brain metastasis with earlier administration of cranial irradiation after the initiation of induction chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic cranial irradiation improves both overall survival and disease-free survival among patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ganesh, K., & Massagué, J. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-01195-4 · Cited by 1,051
Le Rhun, E., Weller, M., Brandsma, D., Van den Bent, M., de Azambuja, E., Henriksson, R., Boulanger, T., Peters, S., Watts, C., Wick, W., et al. (2017) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx221 · Cited by 637
Sundstrøm, S., Bremnes, R. M., Kaasa, S., Aasebø, U., Hatlevoll, R., Dahle, R., Boye, N., Wang, M., Vigander, T., Vilsvik, J., et al. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2002.12.111 · Cited by 499
Radiotherapy treatment for lung cancer: Current status and future directions
Vinod, S. K., & Hau, E. (2020) · Respirology · doi:10.1111/resp.13870 · Cited by 412
Brain metastases: epidemiology
(2018) · Handbook of Clinical Neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-811161-1.00002-5 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Aupérin, A., Arriagada, R., Pignon, J.-P., Le Péchoux, C., Gregor, A., Stephens, R. J., Kristjansen, P. E. G., Johnson, B. E., Ueoka, H., Wagner, H., & Aisner, J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1999-08-12
- Volume
- 341
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 476-484
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2339444986
- Cited by
- 1,718
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation for Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Complete Remission. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199908123410703
- The paper
- Aupérin, A., Arriagada, R., Pignon, J.-P., Le Péchoux, C., Gregor, A., Stephens, R. J., Kristjansen, P. E. G., Johnson, B. E., Ueoka, H., Wagner, H., & Aisner, J. (1999). Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation for Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Complete Remission. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199908123410703
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.