The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comparison of Continuous Thalamic Stimulation and Thalamotomy for Suppression of Severe Tremor
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Deep-brain stimulation through an electrode implanted in the thalamus was developed as an alternative to thalamotomy for the treatment of drug-resistant tremor. Stimulation is thought to be as effective as thalamotomy but to have fewer complications. We examined the effects of these two procedures on the functional abilities of patients with drug-resistant tremor due to Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, or multiple sclerosis. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients (45 with Parkinson's disease, 13 with essential tremor, and 10 with multiple sclerosis) were randomly assigned to undergo thalamotomy or thalamic stimulation. The primary outcome measure was the change in functional abilities six months after surgery, as measured by the Frenchay Activities Index. Scores for this index can range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating better function. Secondary outcome measures were the severity of tremor, the number of adverse effects, and patients' assessment of the outcome. RESULTS: Functional status improved more in the thalamic-stimulation group than in the thalamotomy group, as indicated by increases in the score for the Frenchay Activities Index (from 31.4 to 36.3 and from 32.0 to 32.5, respectively; difference between groups, 4.4 points; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.0 to 6.9). After adjustment for base-line characteristics, multivariate analysis also showed that the thalamic-stimulation group had greater improvement (difference between groups, 5.1 points; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.3 to 7.9). Tremor was suppressed completely or almost completely in 27 of 34 patients in the thalamotomy group and in 30 of 33 patients in the thalamic-stimulation group. One patient in the thalamic-stimulation group died perioperatively after an intracerebral hemorrhage. With the exception of this incident, thalamic stimulation was associated with significantly fewer adverse effects than thalamotomy. Functional status was reported as improved by 8 patients in the thalamotomy group, as compared with 18 patients in the thalamic-stimulation group (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Thalamic stimulation and thalamotomy are equally effective for the suppression of drug-resistant tremor, but thalamic stimulation has fewer adverse effects and results in a greater improvement in function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Kurtzke, J. F. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 · Cited by 15,011
Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality
Hoehn, M. M., & Yahr, M. D. (1967) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.17.5.427 · Cited by 12,107
Statistical prediction of the optimal site for thalamotomy in parkinsonian tremor
Lenz, F. A., Normand, S. L., Kwan, H. C., Andrews, D., Rowland, L. H., Jones, M. W., Seike, M., Lin, Y. C., Tasker, R. R., Dostrovsky, J. O., et al. (1995) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.870100315 · Cited by 120
Thalamotomy for essential and cerebellar tremor
Shahzadi, S., Tasker, R. R., & Lozano, A. (1996) · Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery · doi:10.1159/000098890 · Cited by 84
Cited by
Responsive cortical stimulation for the treatment of medically intractable partial epilepsy
Morrell, M. J. (2011) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182302056 · Cited by 1,282
A Randomized Trial of Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Essential Tremor
Elias, W. J., Lipsman, N., Ondo, W. G., Ghanouni, P., Kim, Y. G., Lee, W., Schwartz, M., Hynynen, K., Lozano, A. M., Shah, B. B., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1600159 · Cited by 1,167
Translational principles of deep brain stimulation
Kringelbach, M. L., Jenkinson, N., Owen, S. L. F., & Aziz, T. Z. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2196 · Cited by 853
MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor: a proof-of-concept study
Lipsman, N., Schwartz, M. L., Huang, Y., Lee, L., Sankar, T., Chapman, M., Hynynen, K., & Lozano, A. M. (2013) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70048-6 · Cited by 604
Sturm, V., Lenartz, D., Koulousakis, A., Treuer, H., Herholz, K., Klein, J. C., & Klosterkötter, J. (2003) · Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy · doi:10.1016/j.jchemneu.2003.09.003 · Cited by 567
Metadata
- Authors
- Schuurman, P. R., Bosch, D. A., Bossuyt, P. M. M., Bonsel, G. J., van Someren, E. J. W., de Bie, R. M. A., Merkus, M. P., & Speelman, J. D.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2000-02-17
- Volume
- 342
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 461-468
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2050436219
- Cited by
- 1,044
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 35.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of Continuous Thalamic Stimulation and Thalamotomy for Suppression of Severe Tremor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200002173420703
- The paper
- Schuurman, P. R., Bosch, D. A., Bossuyt, P. M. M., Bonsel, G. J., van Someren, E. J. W., de Bie, R. M. A., Merkus, M. P., & Speelman, J. D. (2000). A Comparison of Continuous Thalamic Stimulation and Thalamotomy for Suppression of Severe Tremor. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200002173420703
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.