The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ceftriaxone-Resistant Salmonella Infection Acquired by a Child from Cattle
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The emergence of resistance to antimicrobial agents within the salmonellae is a worldwide problem that has been associated with the use of antibiotics in livestock. Resistance to ceftriaxone and the fluoroquinolones, which are used to treat invasive salmonella infections, is rare in the United States. We analyzed the molecular characteristics of a ceftriaxone-resistant strain of Salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium isolated from a 12-year-old boy with fever, abdominal pain, and diarrhea. METHODS: We used pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and analysis of plasmids and beta-lactamases to compare the ceftriaxone-resistant S. enterica serotype typhimurium from the child with four isolates of this strain obtained from cattle during a local outbreak of salmonellosis. RESULTS: The ceftriaxone-resistant isolate from the child was indistinguishable from one of the isolates from cattle, which was also resistant to ceftriaxone. Both ceftriaxone-resistant isolates were resistant to 13 antimicrobial agents; all but one of the resistance determinants were on a conjugative plasmid of 160 kb that encoded the functional group 1 beta-lactamase CMY-2. Both ceftriaxone-resistant isolates were closely related to the three other salmonella isolates obtained from cattle, all of which were susceptible to ceftriaxone. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides additional evidence that antibiotic-resistant strains of salmonella in the United States evolve primarily in livestock. Resistance to ceftriaxone, the drug of choice for invasive salmonella disease, is a public health concern, especially with respect to children, since fluoroquinolones, which can also be used to treat this disease, are not approved for use in children.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chopra, I., & Roberts, M. (2001) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.65.2.232-260.2001 · Cited by 4,517
Food Animals and Antimicrobials: Impacts on Human Health
Marshall, B. M., & Levy, S. B. (2011) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00002-11 · Cited by 2,241
Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria: Enterobacteriaceae
Paterson, D. L. (2006) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.03.013 · Cited by 874
Angulo, F. J., Nargund, V. N., & Chiller, T. C. (2004) · Journal of Veterinary Medicine, Series B · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0450.2004.00789.x · Cited by 355
Self-citationAntimicrobial usage and resistance in beef production
Cameron, A., & McAllister, T. A. (2016) · Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s40104-016-0127-3 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Fey, P. D., Safranek, T. J., Rupp, M. E., Dunne, E. F., Ribot, E., Iwen, P. C., Bradford, P. A., Angulo, F. J., & Hinrichs, S. H.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2000-04-27
- Volume
- 342
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1242-1249
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2322361714
- Cited by
- 540
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 66.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ceftriaxone-Resistant Salmonella Infection Acquired by a Child from Cattle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200004273421703
- The paper
- Fey, P. D., Safranek, T. J., Rupp, M. E., Dunne, E. F., Ribot, E., Iwen, P. C., Bradford, P. A., Angulo, F. J., & Hinrichs, S. H. (2000). Ceftriaxone-Resistant Salmonella Infection Acquired by a Child from Cattle. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200004273421703
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.