The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation by Chest Compression Alone or with Mouth-to-Mouth Ventilation
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Despite extensive training of citizens of Seattle in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), bystanders do not perform CPR in almost half of witnessed cardiac arrests. Instructions in chest compression plus mouth-to-mouth ventilation given by dispatchers over the telephone can require 2.4 minutes. In experimental studies, chest compression alone is associated with survival rates similar to those with chest compression plus mouth-to-mouth ventilation. We conducted a randomized study to compare CPR by chest compression alone with CPR by chest compression plus mouth-to-mouth ventilation. METHODS: The setting of the trial was an urban, fire-department-based, emergency-medical-care system with central dispatching. In a randomized manner, telephone dispatchers gave bystanders at the scene of apparent cardiac arrest instructions in either chest compression alone or chest compression plus mouth-to-mouth ventilation. The primary end point was survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 241 patients randomly assigned to receive chest compression alone and 279 assigned to chest compression plus mouth-to-mouth ventilation. Complete instructions were delivered in 62 percent of episodes for the group receiving chest compression plus mouth-to-mouth ventilation and 81 percent of episodes for the group receiving chest compression alone (P=0.005). Instructions for compression required 1.4 minutes less to complete than instructions for compression plus mouth-to-mouth ventilation. Survival to hospital discharge was better among patients assigned to chest compression alone than among those assigned to chest compression plus mouth-to-mouth ventilation (14.6 percent vs. 10.4 percent), but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.18). CONCLUSIONS: The outcome after CPR with chest compression alone is similar to that after chest compression with mouth-to-mouth ventilation, and chest compression alone may be the preferred approach for bystanders inexperienced in CPR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Wik, L. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.3.299 · Cited by 1,538
Soar, J., Berg, K. M., Andersen, L. W., Böttiger, B. W., Cacciola, S., Callaway, C. W., Couper, K., Cronberg, T., D’Arrigo, S., Deakin, C. D., et al. (2020) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.09.012 · Cited by 616
Aufderheide, T. P., & Lurie, K. G. (2004) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000134335.46859.09 · Cited by 555
(2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60451-6 · Cited by 533
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: prehospital management
Ong, M. E. H., Perkins, G. D., & Cariou, A. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30316-7 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Hallstrom, A., Cobb, L., Johnson, E., & Copass, M.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2000-05-25
- Volume
- 342
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 1546-1553
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2330754709
- Cited by
- 563
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation by Chest Compression Alone or with Mouth-to-Mouth Ventilation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200005253422101
- The paper
- Hallstrom, A., Cobb, L., Johnson, E., & Copass, M. (2000). Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation by Chest Compression Alone or with Mouth-to-Mouth Ventilation. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200005253422101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.