The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although standard heavy-weight polypropylene mesh significantly decreases the risk of hernia recurrence, 6 its usual configuration has rendered it capable of withstanding a force of 6 to 10 times the calculated tensile strength of the average abdominal wall, suggesting that it is overengineered to a supratherapeutic strength.7,8”
From Effect of Hernia Mesh Weights on Postoperative Patient-Related and Clinical Outcomes After Open Ventral Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial (2021) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“In a prospective, randomized study comparing mesh repair to suture repair without mesh, Luijendijk et al. reported 24% recurrence at 3 years for mesh repairs compared to 43% recurrence for suture repairs [26].”
From Prospective, multicenter study of P4HB (Phasix™) mesh for hernia repair in cohort at risk for complications: 3-Year follow-up (2021) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Studies by Luijendijk and Berger have demonstrated improved outcomes for mesh-based hernia repairs relative to suture-based repairs, making mesh-based repairs the current standard of care [25,26].”
From Prospective, multicenter study of P4HB (Phasix™) mesh for hernia repair in cohort at risk for complications: 3-Year follow-up (2021) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Permanent synthetic meshes are commonly utilized in these applications (5–9).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- 10.1002/bjs.1800720127 · DOI
- Lewis RT, 1989, Can J Surg, 32, 196
- 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80078-6 · DOI
- Read RC, 1989, Arch Surg, 124, 485, 10.1001/archsurg.1989.01410040095022 · DOI · Paper page
- Manninen MJ, 1991, Eur J Surg, 157, 29
- Luijendijk RW. “Incisional hernia”: risk factors, prevention, and repair. (Ph.D. thesis.) Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Erasmus University Rotterdam, 2000.
- 10.1080/110241598750004391 · DOI
- 10.1007/s002689910018 · DOI
- van der Linden FTPM, 1988, Neth J Surg, 40, 127
- 10.1001/archsurg.133.4.378 · DOI · Paper page
- Rives J, 1985, Chirurgie, 111, 215
- 10.1007/BF01658869 · DOI
- Usher FC, 1962, Arch Surg, 84, 325, 10.1001/archsurg.1962.01300210059012 · DOI
- Lichtenstein IL, 1991, Am Surg, 57, 730
- 10.1002/bjs.1800810230 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02426380 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01576729 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00002-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00002-7 · DOI
- George CD, 1986, Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 68, 185
- Hesselink VJ, 1993, Surg Gynecol Obstet, 176, 228
- 10.1007/s002689900194 · DOI
- Cannon DJ, 1984, Arch Surg, 119, 387, 10.1001/archsurg.1984.01390160023005 · DOI
- Adye B, 1998, Am J Surg, 175, 400
- Stevick CA, 1988, Am Surg, 54, 287
- 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80018-X · DOI
- 10.1016/S1078-5884(96)80106-7 · DOI
- Johnson B, 1995, J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 36, 487
- 10.1053/ejvs.1998.0726 · DOI
- Tilson MD, 1983, Surgery, 94, 134
- 10.1016/0021-9150(87)90003-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1067/mva.1987.avs0060578 · DOI
- 10.1159/000008740 · DOI
- 10.1097/00000658-199312000-00009 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01207484 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01364.x · DOI
- Loury JN, 1983, Presse Med, 12, 2116
- Dasika UK, 1998, Am Surg, 64, 817
- Soler M, 1993, Ann Chir, 47, 598
- 10.1002/jbm.820280312 · DOI
Cited by
Xu, H., Wan, H., Sandor, M., Qi, S., Ervin, F., Harper, J. R., Silverman, R. P., & McQuillan, D. J. (2008) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2007.0316 · Cited by 160
Krpata, D. M., Petro, C. C., Prabhu, A. S., Tastaldi, L., Zolin, S., Fafaj, A., Rosenblatt, S., Poulose, B. K., Pierce, R. A., Warren, J. A., et al. (2021) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4309 · Cited by 78
Abdelfatah, M. M., Rostambeigi, N., Podgaetz, E., & Sarr, M. G. (2015) · Hernia · doi:10.1007/s10029-013-1165-9 · Cited by 65
Roth, J. S., Anthone, G. J., Selzer, D. J., Poulose, B. K., Pierce, R. A., Bittner, J. G., Hope, W. W., Dunn, R. M., Martindale, R. G., Goldblatt, M. I., et al. (2021) · Annals of Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.002 · Cited by 40
Postoperative Work and Activity Restrictions After Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review
Loor, M. M., Shah, P., Olavarria, O. A., Dhanani, N., Franz, M. G., Trautner, B. W., & Liang, M. K. (2021) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000004725 · Cited by 21
Van den Dop, L. M., Van Rooijen, M. M. J., Tollens, T., Jørgensen, L. N., De Vries-Reilingh, T. S., Piessen, G., Köckerling, F., Miserez, M., Dean, M., Berrevoet, F., et al. (2023) · Annals of Surgery Open · doi:10.1097/as9.0000000000000366 · Cited by 21
Self-citationGolla, D., & Russo, C. C. (2014) · International Surgery · doi:10.9738/intsurg-d-13-00170.1 · Cited by 8
Deeken, C. R., Rosen, M. J., Poulose, B. K., Bradbury, K., Huang, L.-C., Ma, J., & Badhwar, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Surgery · doi:10.3389/fsurg.2023.1280991 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Luijendijk, R. W., Hop, W. C. J., van den Tol, M. P., de Lange, D. C. D., Braaksma, M. M. J., IJzermans, J. N. M., Boelhouwer, R. U., de Vries, B. C., Salu, M. K. M., Wereldsma, J. C. J., Bruijninckx, C. M. A., & Jeekel, J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2000-08-10
- Volume
- 343
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 392-398
- ISSN
- 0028-4793
- 1533-4406
- Cited by
- 1,508
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
