Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 954

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Efficacy of Mycophenolate Mofetil in Patients with Diffuse Proliferative Lupus Nephritis

Open access
Chan, Tak Mao, Li, Fu Keung, Tang, Colin S.O., Wong, Raymond W.S., Fang, Guo Xiang, Ji, Yu Lian, Lau, Chak Sing, Wong, Andrew K.M., Tong, Matthew K.L., Chan, Kwok Wah, Lai, Kar Neng·2000·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The combination of cyclophosphamide and prednisolone is effective for the treatment of severe lupus nephritis but has serious adverse effects. Whether mycophenolate mofetil can be substituted for cyclophosphamide is not known. METHODS: In 42 patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis we compared the efficacy and side effects of a regimen of prednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil given for 12 months with those of a regimen of prednisolone and cyclophosphamide given for 6 months, followed by prednisolone and azathioprine for 6 months. Complete remission was defined as a value for urinary protein excretion that was less than 0.3 g per 24 hours, with normal urinary sediment, a normal serum albumin concentration, and values for serum creatinine and creatinine clearance that were no more than 15 percent above the base-line values. Partial remission was defined as a value for urinary protein excretion that was between 0.3 and 2.9 g per 24 hours, with a serum albumin concentration of at least 30 g per liter. RESULTS: Eighty-one percent of the 21 patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone (group 1) had a complete remission, and 14 percent had a partial remission, as compared with 76 percent and 14 percent, respectively, of the 21 patients treated with cyclophosphamide and prednisolone followed by azathioprine and prednisolone (group 2). The improvements in the degree of proteinuria and the serum albumin and creatinine concentrations were similar in the two groups. One patient in each group discontinued treatment because of side effects. Infections were noted in 19 percent of the patients in group 1 and in 33 percent of those in group 2 (P = 0.29). Other adverse effects occurred only in group 2; they included amenorrhea (in 23 percent of the patients), hair loss (19 percent), leukopenia (10 percent), and death (10 percent). The rates of relapse were 15 percent and 11 percent, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis, the combination of mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone is as effective as a regimen of cyclophosphamide and prednisolone followed by azathioprine and prednisolone but is less toxic.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm200010193431604

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 954

Metadata

Authors
Chan, T. M., Li, F. K., Tang, C. S. O., Wong, R. W. S., Fang, G. X., Ji, Y. L., Lau, C. S., Wong, A. K. M., Tong, M. K. L., Chan, K. W., & Lai, K. N.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2000-10-19
Volume
343
Issue
16
Pages
1156-1162
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W3156996711
Cited by
954
References
0
FWCI
23.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of Mycophenolate Mofetil in Patients with Diffuse Proliferative Lupus Nephritis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200010193431604
The paper
Chan, T. M., Li, F. K., Tang, C. S. O., Wong, R. W. S., Fang, G. X., Ji, Y. L., Lau, C. S., Wong, A. K. M., Tong, M. K. L., Chan, K. W., & Lai, K. N. (2000). Efficacy of Mycophenolate Mofetil in Patients with Diffuse Proliferative Lupus Nephritis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200010193431604

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.