Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Caffeine Intake and the Risk of First-Trimester Spontaneous Abortion

Open access
Cnattingius, Sven, Signorello, Lisa B., Annerén, Göran, Clausson, Britt, Ekbom, Anders, Ljunger, Elisabeth, Blot, William J., McLaughlin, Joseph K., Petersson, Gunnar, Rane, Anders, Granath, Fredrik·2000·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some epidemiologic studies have suggested that the ingestion of caffeine increases the risk of spontaneous abortion, but the results have been inconsistent. METHODS: We performed a population-based, case-control study of early spontaneous abortion in Uppsala County, Sweden. The subjects were 562 women who had spontaneous abortion at 6 to 12 completed weeks of gestation (the case patients) and 953 women who did not have spontaneous abortion and were matched to the case patients according to the week of gestation (controls). Information on the ingestion of caffeine was obtained from in-person interviews. Plasma cotinine was measured as an indicator of cigarette smoking, and fetal karyotypes were determined from tissue samples. Multivariate analysis was used to estimate the relative risks associated with caffeine ingestion after adjustment for smoking and symptoms of pregnancy such as nausea, vomiting, and tiredness. RESULTS: Among nonsmokers, more spontaneous abortions occurred in women who ingested at least 100 mg of caffeine per day than in women who ingested less than 100 mg per day, with the increase in risk related to the amount ingested (100 to 299 mg per day: odds ratio, 1.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.9 to 1.8; 300 to 499 mg per day: odds ratio, 1.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.9 to 2.0; and 500 mg or more per day: odds ratio, 2.2; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 3.8). Among smokers, caffeine ingestion was not associated with an excess risk of spontaneous abortion. When the analyses were stratified according to the results of karyotyping, the ingestion of moderate or high levels of caffeine was found to be associated with an excess risk of spontaneous abortion when the fetus had a normal or unknown karyotype but not when the fetal karyotype was abnormal. CONCLUSIONS: The ingestion of caffeine may increase the risk of an early spontaneous abortion among non-smoking women carrying fetuses with normal karyotypes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm200012213432503

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Knutti R, 1982, Arch Toxicol Suppl, 5, 187, 10.1007/978-3-642-68511-8_33 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/S0890-6238(98)00024-0 · DOI
  3. Weathersbee PS, 1977, J Reprod Med, 19, 55
  4. 10.2105/AJPH.82.1.85 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1097/00001648-199605000-00006 · DOI
  6. 10.1097/00001648-199105000-00002 · DOI
  7. 10.1097/00001648-199709000-00008 · DOI
  8. 10.1001/jama.270.24.2940 · DOI
  9. 10.1056/NEJM199911253412202 · DOI
  10. 10.1097/00001648-199111000-00004 · DOI
  11. 10.1001/jama.269.5.593 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/humrep/13.8.2286 · DOI
  13. Srisuphan W, 1986, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 154, 14, 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90385-6 · DOI
  14. 10.1097/00001648-199105000-00001 · DOI
  15. 10.1210/jcem-59-5-867 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/pd.1970070505 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/ije/27.4.647 · DOI
  18. Kline J, 1995, Am J Epidemiol, 141, 417, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117444 · DOI
  19. 10.1056/NEJM199902043400501 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1038/clpt.1988.63 · DOI
  21. Dlugosz L, 1992, Epidemiol Rev, 14, 83, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036093 · DOI
  22. Stanton CK, 1995, Am J Epidemiol, 142, 1322, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117600 · DOI
  23. Beaulac-Baillargeon L, 1987, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 157, 1236, 10.1016/S0002-9378(87)80301-0 · DOI
  24. Cook DG, 1996, BMJ, 313, 1358, 10.1136/bmj.313.7069.1358 · DOI
  25. Vlajinac HD, 1997, Am J Epidemiol, 145, 335, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009110 · DOI
  26. Coffee. In: IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Vol. 51. Coffee, tea, mate, methylxanthines and methylglyoxal. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1991:41-206.
  27. 10.1056/NEJM199911253412210 · DOI

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Cnattingius, S., Signorello, L. B., Annerén, G., Clausson, B., Ekbom, A., Ljunger, E., Blot, W. J., McLaughlin, J. K., Petersson, G., Rane, A., & Granath, F.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2000-12-21
Volume
343
Issue
25
Pages
1839-1845
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2004041728
Cited by
264
References
1
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Caffeine Intake and the Risk of First-Trimester Spontaneous Abortion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200012213432503
The paper
Cnattingius, S., Signorello, L. B., Annerén, G., Clausson, B., Ekbom, A., Ljunger, E., Blot, W. J., McLaughlin, J. K., Petersson, G., Rane, A., & Granath, F. (2000). Caffeine Intake and the Risk of First-Trimester Spontaneous Abortion. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200012213432503

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.