The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cellular-Telephone Use and Brain Tumors
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Concern has arisen that the use of hand-held cellular telephones might cause brain tumors. If such a risk does exist, the matter would be of considerable public health importance, given the rapid increase worldwide in the use of these devices. METHODS: We examined the use of cellular telephones in a case-control study of intracranial tumors of the nervous system conducted between 1994 and 1998. We enrolled 782 patients through hospitals in Phoenix, Arizona; Boston; and Pittsburgh; 489 had histologically confirmed glioma, 197 had meningioma, and 96 had acoustic neuroma. The 799 controls were patients admitted to the same hospitals as the patients with brain tumors for a variety of nonmalignant conditions. RESULTS: As compared with never, or very rarely, having used a cellular telephone, the relative risks associated with a cumulative use of a cellular telephone for more than 100 hours were 0.9 for glioma (95 percent confidence interval, 0.5 to 1.6), 0.7 for meningioma (95 percent confidence interval, 0.3 to 1.7), 1.4 for acoustic neuroma (95 percent confidence interval, 0.6 to 3.5), and 1.0 for all types of tumors combined (95 percent confidence interval, 0.6 to 1.5). There was no evidence that the risks were higher among persons who used cellular telephones for 60 or more minutes per day or regularly for five or more years. Tumors did not occur disproportionately often on the side of head on which the telephone was typically used. CONCLUSIONS: These data do not support the hypothesis that the recent use of hand-held cellular telephones causes brain tumors, but they are not sufficient to evaluate the risks among long-term, heavy users and for potentially long induction periods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- 10.1109/25.406605 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.320.7245.1288 · DOI
- McKinlay A, 1997, Radiol Prot Bull, 187, 9
- Hardell L, 1999, Int J Oncol, 15, 113
- 10.2307/3580028 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-510X(97)00140-8 · DOI
- 10.1002/bem.2250160112 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1018449003394 · DOI
- 10.1088/0031-9155/44/10/301 · DOI
- Adey WR. Bioeffects of mobile communications fields: possible mechanisms for cumulative dose. In: Kuster N, Balzano Q, Lin JC, eds. Mobile communications safety. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1997:95-131. · DOI
- 10.2307/3576903 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(1998)32:1<1::AID-EM1>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
- 10.2307/3579738 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.282.19.1814-a · DOI
- 10.2307/3434480 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001648-200003000-00007 · DOI
- 1996, Health Phys, 70, 587
- 10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1998)19:1<1::AID-BEM1>3.0.CO;2-5 · DOI
- Inskip PD, 1999, Radiat Prot Dosim, 86, 45, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032924 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1993.tb00752.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0010-4809(81)90031-8 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001648-199605000-00014 · DOI
- 10.1002/bem.2250100206 · DOI
- Balzano Q, 1999, Radiat Prot Dosim, 83, 165, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032654 · DOI
- 10.1029/94RS01158 · DOI
- 10.1088/0031-9155/39/10/003 · DOI · Paper page
- Dimbylow P, 1999, Radiat Prot Dosim, 83, 139, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032648 · DOI
- Kuster N, Balzano Q. Experimental and numerical dosimetry. In: Kuster N, Balzano Q, Lin JC, eds. Mobile communications safety. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1997:13-64. · DOI
- Dreyer NA, 1999, Radiat Prot Dosim, 83, 159, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032653 · DOI
- Ramsdale PA, 1999, Radiat Prot Dosim, 83, 125, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032646 · DOI
- Millington RJ. Mobile and personal communications in the 90s. In: Kuster N, Balzano Q, Lin JC, eds. Mobile communications safety. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1997:3-9. · DOI
- 10.2307/3434078 · DOI
- Cardis E, 1999, Radiat Prot Dosim, 83, 179, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032657 · DOI
Cited by
Wen, P. Y., & Kesari, S. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0708126 · Cited by 3,511
Epidemiology of Health Effects of Radiofrequency Exposure
ICNIRP (International Commission for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) Standing Committee on Epidemiology:, Ahlbom, A., Green, A., Kheifets, L., Savitz, D., & Swerdlow, A. (2004) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.7306 · Cited by 350
Mobile phone use and brain tumours in the CERENAT case-control study
Coureau, G., Bouvier, G., Lebailly, P., Fabbro-Peray, P., Gruber, A., Leffondre, K., Guillamo, J.-S., Loiseau, H., Mathoulin-Pélissier, S., Salamon, R., et al. (2014) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oemed-2013-101754 · Cited by 159
Hardell, L., & Carlberg, M. (2015) · Pathophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.pathophys.2014.10.001 · Cited by 114
Little, M. P., Rajaraman, P., Curtis, R. E., Devesa, S. S., Inskip, P. D., Check, D. P., & Linet, M. S. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e1147 · Cited by 110
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Inskip, P. D., Tarone, R. E., Hatch, E. E., Wilcosky, T. C., Shapiro, W. R., Selker, R. G., Fine, H. A., Black, P. M., Loeffler, J. S., & Linet, M. S.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2001-01-11
- Volume
- 344
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 79-86
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2313535070
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellular-Telephone Use and Brain Tumors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200101113440201
- The paper
- Inskip, P. D., Tarone, R. E., Hatch, E. E., Wilcosky, T. C., Shapiro, W. R., Selker, R. G., Fine, H. A., Black, P. M., Loeffler, J. S., & Linet, M. S. (2001). Cellular-Telephone Use and Brain Tumors. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200101113440201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.