Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 483

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cellular-Telephone Use and Brain Tumors

Inskip, Peter D., Tarone, Robert E., Hatch, Elizabeth E., Wilcosky, Timothy C., Shapiro, William R., Selker, Robert G., Fine, Howard A., Black, Peter M., Loeffler, Jay S., Linet, Martha S.·2001·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concern has arisen that the use of hand-held cellular telephones might cause brain tumors. If such a risk does exist, the matter would be of considerable public health importance, given the rapid increase worldwide in the use of these devices. METHODS: We examined the use of cellular telephones in a case-control study of intracranial tumors of the nervous system conducted between 1994 and 1998. We enrolled 782 patients through hospitals in Phoenix, Arizona; Boston; and Pittsburgh; 489 had histologically confirmed glioma, 197 had meningioma, and 96 had acoustic neuroma. The 799 controls were patients admitted to the same hospitals as the patients with brain tumors for a variety of nonmalignant conditions. RESULTS: As compared with never, or very rarely, having used a cellular telephone, the relative risks associated with a cumulative use of a cellular telephone for more than 100 hours were 0.9 for glioma (95 percent confidence interval, 0.5 to 1.6), 0.7 for meningioma (95 percent confidence interval, 0.3 to 1.7), 1.4 for acoustic neuroma (95 percent confidence interval, 0.6 to 3.5), and 1.0 for all types of tumors combined (95 percent confidence interval, 0.6 to 1.5). There was no evidence that the risks were higher among persons who used cellular telephones for 60 or more minutes per day or regularly for five or more years. Tumors did not occur disproportionately often on the side of head on which the telephone was typically used. CONCLUSIONS: These data do not support the hypothesis that the recent use of hand-held cellular telephones causes brain tumors, but they are not sufficient to evaluate the risks among long-term, heavy users and for potentially long induction periods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm200101113440201

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1109/25.406605 · DOI
  2. 10.1136/bmj.320.7245.1288 · DOI
  3. McKinlay A, 1997, Radiol Prot Bull, 187, 9
  4. Hardell L, 1999, Int J Oncol, 15, 113
  5. 10.2307/3580028 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0022-510X(97)00140-8 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/bem.2250160112 · DOI
  8. 10.1023/A:1018449003394 · DOI
  9. 10.1088/0031-9155/44/10/301 · DOI
  10. Adey WR. Bioeffects of mobile communications fields: possible mechanisms for cumulative dose. In: Kuster N, Balzano Q, Lin JC, eds. Mobile communications safety. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1997:95-131. · DOI
  11. 10.2307/3576903 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(1998)32:1<1::AID-EM1>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
  13. 10.2307/3579738 · DOI
  14. 10.1001/jama.282.19.1814-a · DOI
  15. 10.2307/3434480 · DOI
  16. 10.1097/00001648-200003000-00007 · DOI
  17. 1996, Health Phys, 70, 587
  18. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1998)19:1<1::AID-BEM1>3.0.CO;2-5 · DOI
  19. Inskip PD, 1999, Radiat Prot Dosim, 86, 45, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032924 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1993.tb00752.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/0010-4809(81)90031-8 · DOI
  22. 10.1097/00001648-199605000-00014 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/bem.2250100206 · DOI
  24. Balzano Q, 1999, Radiat Prot Dosim, 83, 165, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032654 · DOI
  25. 10.1029/94RS01158 · DOI
  26. 10.1088/0031-9155/39/10/003 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Dimbylow P, 1999, Radiat Prot Dosim, 83, 139, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032648 · DOI
  28. Kuster N, Balzano Q. Experimental and numerical dosimetry. In: Kuster N, Balzano Q, Lin JC, eds. Mobile communications safety. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1997:13-64. · DOI
  29. Dreyer NA, 1999, Radiat Prot Dosim, 83, 159, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032653 · DOI
  30. Ramsdale PA, 1999, Radiat Prot Dosim, 83, 125, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032646 · DOI
  31. Millington RJ. Mobile and personal communications in the 90s. In: Kuster N, Balzano Q, Lin JC, eds. Mobile communications safety. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1997:3-9. · DOI
  32. 10.2307/3434078 · DOI
  33. Cardis E, 1999, Radiat Prot Dosim, 83, 179, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032657 · DOI

Cited by

See all 483

Metadata

Authors
Inskip, P. D., Tarone, R. E., Hatch, E. E., Wilcosky, T. C., Shapiro, W. R., Selker, R. G., Fine, H. A., Black, P. M., Loeffler, J. S., & Linet, M. S.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2001-01-11
Volume
344
Issue
2
Pages
79-86
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2313535070
Cited by
483
References
0
FWCI
27.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellular-Telephone Use and Brain Tumors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200101113440201
The paper
Inskip, P. D., Tarone, R. E., Hatch, E. E., Wilcosky, T. C., Shapiro, W. R., Selker, R. G., Fine, H. A., Black, P. M., Loeffler, J. S., & Linet, M. S. (2001). Cellular-Telephone Use and Brain Tumors. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200101113440201

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.